Culiacan's 2024 population is now estimated at 903,910. In 1950, the population of Culiacan was 49,148. Culiacan has grown by 15,290 in the last year, which represents a 1.72% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Culiacan, which typically includes Culiacan's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 1,034,665 |
| 2034 | 1,024,490 |
| 2033 | 1,014,068 |
| 2032 | 1,003,396 |
| 2031 | 992,470 |
| 2030 | 981,268 |
| 2029 | 969,760 |
| 2028 | 957,896 |
| 2027 | 945,603 |
| 2026 | 932,385 |
| 2025 | 918,494 |
| 2024 | 903,910 |
| 2023 | 888,620 |
| 2022 | 872,643 |
| 2021 | 856,072 |
| 2020 | 839,054 |
| 2019 | 821,781 |
| 2018 | 804,467 |
| 2017 | 787,328 |
| 2016 | 770,554 |
| 2015 | 754,092 |
| 2014 | 738,004 |
| 2013 | 722,259 |
| 2012 | 706,871 |
| 2011 | 691,770 |
| 2010 | 677,012 |
| 2009 | 661,190 |
| 2008 | 645,634 |
| 2007 | 630,403 |
| 2006 | 615,551 |
| 2005 | 601,757 |
| 2004 | 589,940 |
| 2003 | 578,324 |
| 2002 | 566,951 |
| 2001 | 555,803 |
| 2000 | 544,888 |
| 1999 | 535,519 |
| 1998 | 527,131 |
| 1997 | 518,875 |
| 1996 | 510,760 |
| 1995 | 499,413 |
| 1994 | 482,273 |
| 1993 | 465,721 |
| 1992 | 449,759 |
| 1991 | 434,302 |
| 1990 | 419,397 |
| 1989 | 405,954 |
| 1988 | 393,352 |
| 1987 | 381,108 |
| 1986 | 369,261 |
| 1985 | 357,782 |
| 1984 | 346,675 |
| 1983 | 335,884 |
| 1982 | 325,442 |
| 1981 | 315,326 |
| 1980 | 305,537 |
| 1979 | 288,969 |
| 1978 | 272,797 |
| 1977 | 257,529 |
| 1976 | 243,137 |
| 1975 | 229,512 |
| 1974 | 216,668 |
| 1973 | 204,542 |
| 1972 | 193,110 |
| 1971 | 182,289 |
| 1970 | 172,087 |
| 1969 | 161,237 |
| 1968 | 150,258 |
| 1967 | 139,998 |
| 1966 | 130,452 |
| 1965 | 121,557 |
| 1964 | 113,280 |
| 1963 | 105,545 |
| 1962 | 98,349 |
| 1961 | 91,643 |
| 1960 | 85,402 |
| 1959 | 80,735 |
| 1958 | 76,403 |
| 1957 | 72,304 |
| 1956 | 68,430 |
| 1955 | 64,753 |
| 1954 | 61,279 |
| 1953 | 57,991 |
| 1952 | 54,884 |
| 1951 | 51,935 |
| 1950 | 49,148 |
Year | Population | Growth Rate | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 49,148 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 51,935 | 5.67% | 2,787 |
| 1952 | 54,884 | 5.68% | 2,949 |
| 1953 | 57,991 | 5.66% | 3,107 |
| 1954 | 61,279 | 5.67% | 3,288 |
| 1955 | 64,753 | 5.67% | 3,474 |
| 1956 | 68,430 | 5.68% | 3,677 |
| 1957 | 72,304 | 5.66% | 3,874 |
| 1958 | 76,403 | 5.67% | 4,099 |
| 1959 | 80,735 | 5.67% | 4,332 |
| 1960 | 85,402 | 5.78% | 4,667 |
| 1961 | 91,643 | 7.31% | 6,241 |
| 1962 | 98,349 | 7.32% | 6,706 |
| 1963 | 105,545 | 7.32% | 7,196 |
| 1964 | 113,280 | 7.33% | 7,735 |
| 1965 | 121,557 | 7.31% | 8,277 |
| 1966 | 130,452 | 7.32% | 8,895 |
| 1967 | 139,998 | 7.32% | 9,546 |
| 1968 | 150,258 | 7.33% | 10,260 |
| 1969 | 161,237 | 7.31% | 10,979 |
| 1970 | 172,087 | 6.73% | 10,850 |
| 1971 | 182,289 | 5.93% | 10,202 |
| 1972 | 193,110 | 5.94% | 10,821 |
| 1973 | 204,542 | 5.92% | 11,432 |
| 1974 | 216,668 | 5.93% | 12,126 |
| 1975 | 229,512 | 5.93% | 12,844 |
| 1976 | 243,137 | 5.94% | 13,625 |
| 1977 | 257,529 | 5.92% | 14,392 |
| 1978 | 272,797 | 5.93% | 15,268 |
| 1979 | 288,969 | 5.93% | 16,172 |
| 1980 | 305,537 | 5.73% | 16,568 |
| 1981 | 315,326 | 3.2% | 9,789 |
| 1982 | 325,442 | 3.21% | 10,116 |
| 1983 | 335,884 | 3.21% | 10,442 |
| 1984 | 346,675 | 3.21% | 10,791 |
| 1985 | 357,782 | 3.2% | 11,107 |
| 1986 | 369,261 | 3.21% | 11,479 |
| 1987 | 381,108 | 3.21% | 11,847 |
| 1988 | 393,352 | 3.21% | 12,244 |
| 1989 | 405,954 | 3.2% | 12,602 |
| 1990 | 419,397 | 3.31% | 13,443 |
| 1991 | 434,302 | 3.55% | 14,905 |
| 1992 | 449,759 | 3.56% | 15,457 |
| 1993 | 465,721 | 3.55% | 15,962 |
| 1994 | 482,273 | 3.55% | 16,552 |
| 1995 | 499,413 | 3.55% | 17,140 |
| 1996 | 510,760 | 2.27% | 11,347 |
| 1997 | 518,875 | 1.59% | 8,115 |
| 1998 | 527,131 | 1.59% | 8,256 |
| 1999 | 535,519 | 1.59% | 8,388 |
| 2000 | 544,888 | 1.75% | 9,369 |
| 2001 | 555,803 | 2% | 10,915 |
| 2002 | 566,951 | 2.01% | 11,148 |
| 2003 | 578,324 | 2.01% | 11,373 |
| 2004 | 589,940 | 2.01% | 11,616 |
| 2005 | 601,757 | 2% | 11,817 |
| 2006 | 615,551 | 2.29% | 13,794 |
| 2007 | 630,403 | 2.41% | 14,852 |
| 2008 | 645,634 | 2.42% | 15,231 |
| 2009 | 661,190 | 2.41% | 15,556 |
| 2010 | 677,012 | 2.39% | 15,822 |
| 2011 | 691,770 | 2.18% | 14,758 |
| 2012 | 706,871 | 2.18% | 15,101 |
| 2013 | 722,259 | 2.18% | 15,388 |
| 2014 | 738,004 | 2.18% | 15,745 |
| 2015 | 754,092 | 2.18% | 16,088 |
| 2016 | 770,554 | 2.18% | 16,462 |
| 2017 | 787,328 | 2.18% | 16,774 |
| 2018 | 804,467 | 2.18% | 17,139 |
| 2019 | 821,781 | 2.15% | 17,314 |
| 2020 | 839,054 | 2.1% | 17,273 |
| 2021 | 856,072 | 2.03% | 17,018 |
| 2022 | 872,643 | 1.94% | 16,571 |
| 2023 | 888,620 | 1.83% | 15,977 |
| 2024 | 903,910 | 1.72% | 15,290 |
| 2025 | 918,494 | 1.61% | 14,584 |
| 2026 | 932,385 | 1.51% | 13,891 |
| 2027 | 945,603 | 1.42% | 13,218 |
| 2028 | 957,896 | 1.3% | 12,293 |
| 2029 | 969,760 | 1.24% | 11,864 |
| 2030 | 981,268 | 1.19% | 11,508 |
| 2031 | 992,470 | 1.14% | 11,202 |
| 2032 | 1,003,396 | 1.1% | 10,926 |
| 2033 | 1,014,068 | 1.06% | 10,672 |
| 2034 | 1,024,490 | 1.03% | 10,422 |
| 2035 | 1,034,665 | 0.99% | 10,175 |
Name | 2024 Population | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,315 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,678 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,355 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,342 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,336 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,216 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,435 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,135 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,085 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,818 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,133 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,654 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,982 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,301 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,169 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,342 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,567 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,005 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,772 | 1.35% |