Kisangani's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,483,513. In 1950, the population of Kisangani was 38,299. Kisangani has grown by 60,118 in the last year, which represents a 4.22% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Kisangani, which typically includes Kisangani's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 2,316,753 |
| 2034 | 2,229,669 |
| 2033 | 2,144,703 |
| 2032 | 2,061,870 |
| 2031 | 1,981,325 |
| 2030 | 1,902,936 |
| 2029 | 1,826,815 |
| 2028 | 1,752,962 |
| 2027 | 1,681,597 |
| 2026 | 1,612,772 |
| 2025 | 1,546,690 |
| 2024 | 1,483,513 |
| 2023 | 1,423,395 |
| 2022 | 1,366,342 |
| 2021 | 1,312,353 |
| 2020 | 1,261,310 |
| 2019 | 1,213,000 |
| 2018 | 1,167,095 |
| 2017 | 1,123,227 |
| 2016 | 1,081,008 |
| 2015 | 1,040,376 |
| 2014 | 1,001,271 |
| 2013 | 963,636 |
| 2012 | 927,416 |
| 2011 | 892,557 |
| 2010 | 859,008 |
| 2009 | 826,721 |
| 2008 | 795,646 |
| 2007 | 765,740 |
| 2006 | 736,958 |
| 2005 | 709,258 |
| 2004 | 682,599 |
| 2003 | 656,942 |
| 2002 | 632,283 |
| 2001 | 608,550 |
| 2000 | 585,738 |
| 1999 | 563,722 |
| 1998 | 542,562 |
| 1997 | 522,196 |
| 1996 | 502,622 |
| 1995 | 483,730 |
| 1994 | 465,572 |
| 1993 | 448,097 |
| 1992 | 431,300 |
| 1991 | 415,088 |
| 1990 | 399,508 |
| 1989 | 384,512 |
| 1988 | 370,098 |
| 1987 | 356,187 |
| 1986 | 342,817 |
| 1985 | 329,949 |
| 1984 | 317,581 |
| 1983 | 310,824 |
| 1982 | 304,219 |
| 1981 | 297,754 |
| 1980 | 291,436 |
| 1979 | 285,235 |
| 1978 | 279,174 |
| 1977 | 273,242 |
| 1976 | 267,444 |
| 1975 | 261,753 |
| 1974 | 256,190 |
| 1973 | 250,747 |
| 1972 | 245,426 |
| 1971 | 240,204 |
| 1970 | 235,100 |
| 1969 | 222,279 |
| 1968 | 210,174 |
| 1967 | 198,698 |
| 1966 | 187,862 |
| 1965 | 177,618 |
| 1964 | 167,945 |
| 1963 | 158,774 |
| 1962 | 150,116 |
| 1961 | 141,929 |
| 1960 | 134,200 |
| 1959 | 112,459 |
| 1958 | 94,264 |
| 1957 | 79,012 |
| 1956 | 66,244 |
| 1955 | 60,456 |
| 1954 | 55,181 |
| 1953 | 50,366 |
| 1952 | 45,977 |
| 1951 | 41,960 |
| 1950 | 38,299 |
Year | Population | Growth Rate | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 38,299 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 41,960 | 9.56% | 3,661 |
| 1952 | 45,977 | 9.57% | 4,017 |
| 1953 | 50,366 | 9.55% | 4,389 |
| 1954 | 55,181 | 9.56% | 4,815 |
| 1955 | 60,456 | 9.56% | 5,275 |
| 1956 | 66,244 | 9.57% | 5,788 |
| 1957 | 79,012 | 19.27% | 12,768 |
| 1958 | 94,264 | 19.3% | 15,252 |
| 1959 | 112,459 | 19.3% | 18,195 |
| 1960 | 134,200 | 19.33% | 21,741 |
| 1961 | 141,929 | 5.76% | 7,729 |
| 1962 | 150,116 | 5.77% | 8,187 |
| 1963 | 158,774 | 5.77% | 8,658 |
| 1964 | 167,945 | 5.78% | 9,171 |
| 1965 | 177,618 | 5.76% | 9,673 |
| 1966 | 187,862 | 5.77% | 10,244 |
| 1967 | 198,698 | 5.77% | 10,836 |
| 1968 | 210,174 | 5.78% | 11,476 |
| 1969 | 222,279 | 5.76% | 12,105 |
| 1970 | 235,100 | 5.77% | 12,821 |
| 1971 | 240,204 | 2.17% | 5,104 |
| 1972 | 245,426 | 2.17% | 5,222 |
| 1973 | 250,747 | 2.17% | 5,321 |
| 1974 | 256,190 | 2.17% | 5,443 |
| 1975 | 261,753 | 2.17% | 5,563 |
| 1976 | 267,444 | 2.17% | 5,691 |
| 1977 | 273,242 | 2.17% | 5,798 |
| 1978 | 279,174 | 2.17% | 5,932 |
| 1979 | 285,235 | 2.17% | 6,061 |
| 1980 | 291,436 | 2.17% | 6,201 |
| 1981 | 297,754 | 2.17% | 6,318 |
| 1982 | 304,219 | 2.17% | 6,465 |
| 1983 | 310,824 | 2.17% | 6,605 |
| 1984 | 317,581 | 2.17% | 6,757 |
| 1985 | 329,949 | 3.89% | 12,368 |
| 1986 | 342,817 | 3.9% | 12,868 |
| 1987 | 356,187 | 3.9% | 13,370 |
| 1988 | 370,098 | 3.91% | 13,911 |
| 1989 | 384,512 | 3.89% | 14,414 |
| 1990 | 399,508 | 3.9% | 14,996 |
| 1991 | 415,088 | 3.9% | 15,580 |
| 1992 | 431,300 | 3.91% | 16,212 |
| 1993 | 448,097 | 3.89% | 16,797 |
| 1994 | 465,572 | 3.9% | 17,475 |
| 1995 | 483,730 | 3.9% | 18,158 |
| 1996 | 502,622 | 3.91% | 18,892 |
| 1997 | 522,196 | 3.89% | 19,574 |
| 1998 | 542,562 | 3.9% | 20,366 |
| 1999 | 563,722 | 3.9% | 21,160 |
| 2000 | 585,738 | 3.91% | 22,016 |
| 2001 | 608,550 | 3.89% | 22,812 |
| 2002 | 632,283 | 3.9% | 23,733 |
| 2003 | 656,942 | 3.9% | 24,659 |
| 2004 | 682,599 | 3.91% | 25,657 |
| 2005 | 709,258 | 3.91% | 26,659 |
| 2006 | 736,958 | 3.91% | 27,700 |
| 2007 | 765,740 | 3.91% | 28,782 |
| 2008 | 795,646 | 3.91% | 29,906 |
| 2009 | 826,721 | 3.91% | 31,075 |
| 2010 | 859,008 | 3.91% | 32,287 |
| 2011 | 892,557 | 3.91% | 33,549 |
| 2012 | 927,416 | 3.91% | 34,859 |
| 2013 | 963,636 | 3.91% | 36,220 |
| 2014 | 1,001,271 | 3.91% | 37,635 |
| 2015 | 1,040,376 | 3.91% | 39,105 |
| 2016 | 1,081,008 | 3.91% | 40,632 |
| 2017 | 1,123,227 | 3.91% | 42,219 |
| 2018 | 1,167,095 | 3.91% | 43,868 |
| 2019 | 1,213,000 | 3.93% | 45,905 |
| 2020 | 1,261,310 | 3.98% | 48,310 |
| 2021 | 1,312,353 | 4.05% | 51,043 |
| 2022 | 1,366,342 | 4.11% | 53,989 |
| 2023 | 1,423,395 | 4.18% | 57,053 |
| 2024 | 1,483,513 | 4.22% | 60,118 |
| 2025 | 1,546,690 | 4.26% | 63,177 |
| 2026 | 1,612,772 | 4.27% | 66,082 |
| 2027 | 1,681,597 | 4.27% | 68,825 |
| 2028 | 1,752,962 | 4.24% | 71,365 |
| 2029 | 1,826,815 | 4.21% | 73,853 |
| 2030 | 1,902,936 | 4.17% | 76,121 |
| 2031 | 1,981,325 | 4.12% | 78,389 |
| 2032 | 2,061,870 | 4.07% | 80,545 |
| 2033 | 2,144,703 | 4.02% | 82,833 |
| 2034 | 2,229,669 | 3.96% | 84,966 |
| 2035 | 2,316,753 | 3.91% | 87,084 |
Name | 2024 Population | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Kinshasa | 17,032,322 | 4.39% |
| Mbuji Mayi | 3,022,855 | 4.53% |
| Lubumbashi | 2,933,962 | 4.34% |
| Kananga | 1,738,716 | 4.46% |
| Kisangani | 1,483,513 | 4.22% |
| Bukavu | 1,308,469 | 4.78% |
| Tshikapa | 1,131,226 | 5.02% |
| Bunia | 856,339 | 5.45% |
| Goma | 781,875 | 5.06% |
| Uvira | 725,768 | 5.02% |
| Likasi | 650,465 | 3.76% |
| Kabinda | 606,380 | 6.03% |
| Kikwit | 590,797 | 4.04% |
| Kolwezi | 537,536 | 2.84% |
| Mbandaka | 513,977 | 3.98% |
| Matadi | 448,004 | 3.82% |