La Laguna's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,826,135. In 1950, the population of La Laguna was 217,113. La Laguna has grown by 45,543 in the last year, which represents a 2.56% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of La Laguna, which typically includes La Laguna's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 2,123,371 |
| 2034 | 2,102,478 |
| 2033 | 2,081,060 |
| 2032 | 2,059,081 |
| 2031 | 2,036,468 |
| 2030 | 2,013,048 |
| 2029 | 1,988,548 |
| 2028 | 1,962,526 |
| 2027 | 1,934,358 |
| 2026 | 1,902,427 |
| 2025 | 1,866,580 |
| 2024 | 1,826,135 |
| 2023 | 1,780,592 |
| 2022 | 1,729,825 |
| 2021 | 1,674,258 |
| 2020 | 1,614,854 |
| 2019 | 1,553,033 |
| 2018 | 1,490,477 |
| 2017 | 1,428,915 |
| 2016 | 1,369,896 |
| 2015 | 1,313,161 |
| 2014 | 1,258,849 |
| 2013 | 1,206,784 |
| 2012 | 1,156,939 |
| 2011 | 1,109,024 |
| 2010 | 1,063,155 |
| 2009 | 1,042,506 |
| 2008 | 1,024,433 |
| 2007 | 1,006,623 |
| 2006 | 989,148 |
| 2005 | 971,975 |
| 2004 | 955,124 |
| 2003 | 938,520 |
| 2002 | 922,227 |
| 2001 | 906,216 |
| 2000 | 890,505 |
| 1999 | 874,265 |
| 1998 | 857,895 |
| 1997 | 841,831 |
| 1996 | 826,089 |
| 1995 | 810,599 |
| 1994 | 795,421 |
| 1993 | 780,527 |
| 1992 | 765,931 |
| 1991 | 751,569 |
| 1990 | 737,496 |
| 1989 | 717,652 |
| 1988 | 695,887 |
| 1987 | 674,724 |
| 1986 | 654,232 |
| 1985 | 634,363 |
| 1984 | 615,124 |
| 1983 | 596,417 |
| 1982 | 578,304 |
| 1981 | 560,740 |
| 1980 | 543,734 |
| 1979 | 519,929 |
| 1978 | 496,651 |
| 1977 | 474,414 |
| 1976 | 453,201 |
| 1975 | 432,882 |
| 1974 | 413,501 |
| 1973 | 394,987 |
| 1972 | 377,326 |
| 1971 | 360,409 |
| 1970 | 344,272 |
| 1969 | 335,010 |
| 1968 | 330,443 |
| 1967 | 325,926 |
| 1966 | 321,477 |
| 1965 | 317,088 |
| 1964 | 312,766 |
| 1963 | 308,491 |
| 1962 | 304,279 |
| 1961 | 300,126 |
| 1960 | 296,035 |
| 1959 | 287,268 |
| 1958 | 278,468 |
| 1957 | 269,938 |
| 1956 | 261,680 |
| 1955 | 253,654 |
| 1954 | 245,884 |
| 1953 | 238,352 |
| 1952 | 231,061 |
| 1951 | 223,974 |
| 1950 | 217,113 |
Year | Population | Growth Rate | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 217,113 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 223,974 | 3.16% | 6,861 |
| 1952 | 231,061 | 3.16% | 7,087 |
| 1953 | 238,352 | 3.16% | 7,291 |
| 1954 | 245,884 | 3.16% | 7,532 |
| 1955 | 253,654 | 3.16% | 7,770 |
| 1956 | 261,680 | 3.16% | 8,026 |
| 1957 | 269,938 | 3.16% | 8,258 |
| 1958 | 278,468 | 3.16% | 8,530 |
| 1959 | 287,268 | 3.16% | 8,800 |
| 1960 | 296,035 | 3.05% | 8,767 |
| 1961 | 300,126 | 1.38% | 4,091 |
| 1962 | 304,279 | 1.38% | 4,153 |
| 1963 | 308,491 | 1.38% | 4,212 |
| 1964 | 312,766 | 1.39% | 4,275 |
| 1965 | 317,088 | 1.38% | 4,322 |
| 1966 | 321,477 | 1.38% | 4,389 |
| 1967 | 325,926 | 1.38% | 4,449 |
| 1968 | 330,443 | 1.39% | 4,517 |
| 1969 | 335,010 | 1.38% | 4,567 |
| 1970 | 344,272 | 2.76% | 9,262 |
| 1971 | 360,409 | 4.69% | 16,137 |
| 1972 | 377,326 | 4.69% | 16,917 |
| 1973 | 394,987 | 4.68% | 17,661 |
| 1974 | 413,501 | 4.69% | 18,514 |
| 1975 | 432,882 | 4.69% | 19,381 |
| 1976 | 453,201 | 4.69% | 20,319 |
| 1977 | 474,414 | 4.68% | 21,213 |
| 1978 | 496,651 | 4.69% | 22,237 |
| 1979 | 519,929 | 4.69% | 23,278 |
| 1980 | 543,734 | 4.58% | 23,805 |
| 1981 | 560,740 | 3.13% | 17,006 |
| 1982 | 578,304 | 3.13% | 17,564 |
| 1983 | 596,417 | 3.13% | 18,113 |
| 1984 | 615,124 | 3.14% | 18,707 |
| 1985 | 634,363 | 3.13% | 19,239 |
| 1986 | 654,232 | 3.13% | 19,869 |
| 1987 | 674,724 | 3.13% | 20,492 |
| 1988 | 695,887 | 3.14% | 21,163 |
| 1989 | 717,652 | 3.13% | 21,765 |
| 1990 | 737,496 | 2.77% | 19,844 |
| 1991 | 751,569 | 1.91% | 14,073 |
| 1992 | 765,931 | 1.91% | 14,362 |
| 1993 | 780,527 | 1.91% | 14,596 |
| 1994 | 795,421 | 1.91% | 14,894 |
| 1995 | 810,599 | 1.91% | 15,178 |
| 1996 | 826,089 | 1.91% | 15,490 |
| 1997 | 841,831 | 1.91% | 15,742 |
| 1998 | 857,895 | 1.91% | 16,064 |
| 1999 | 874,265 | 1.91% | 16,370 |
| 2000 | 890,505 | 1.86% | 16,240 |
| 2001 | 906,216 | 1.76% | 15,711 |
| 2002 | 922,227 | 1.77% | 16,011 |
| 2003 | 938,520 | 1.77% | 16,293 |
| 2004 | 955,124 | 1.77% | 16,604 |
| 2005 | 971,975 | 1.76% | 16,851 |
| 2006 | 989,148 | 1.77% | 17,173 |
| 2007 | 1,006,623 | 1.77% | 17,475 |
| 2008 | 1,024,433 | 1.77% | 17,810 |
| 2009 | 1,042,506 | 1.76% | 18,073 |
| 2010 | 1,063,155 | 1.98% | 20,649 |
| 2011 | 1,109,024 | 4.31% | 45,869 |
| 2012 | 1,156,939 | 4.32% | 47,915 |
| 2013 | 1,206,784 | 4.31% | 49,845 |
| 2014 | 1,258,849 | 4.31% | 52,065 |
| 2015 | 1,313,161 | 4.31% | 54,312 |
| 2016 | 1,369,896 | 4.32% | 56,735 |
| 2017 | 1,428,915 | 4.31% | 59,019 |
| 2018 | 1,490,477 | 4.31% | 61,562 |
| 2019 | 1,553,033 | 4.2% | 62,556 |
| 2020 | 1,614,854 | 3.98% | 61,821 |
| 2021 | 1,674,258 | 3.68% | 59,404 |
| 2022 | 1,729,825 | 3.32% | 55,567 |
| 2023 | 1,780,592 | 2.93% | 50,767 |
| 2024 | 1,826,135 | 2.56% | 45,543 |
| 2025 | 1,866,580 | 2.21% | 40,445 |
| 2026 | 1,902,427 | 1.92% | 35,847 |
| 2027 | 1,934,358 | 1.68% | 31,931 |
| 2028 | 1,962,526 | 1.46% | 28,168 |
| 2029 | 1,988,548 | 1.33% | 26,022 |
| 2030 | 2,013,048 | 1.23% | 24,500 |
| 2031 | 2,036,468 | 1.16% | 23,420 |
| 2032 | 2,059,081 | 1.11% | 22,613 |
| 2033 | 2,081,060 | 1.07% | 21,979 |
| 2034 | 2,102,478 | 1.03% | 21,418 |
| 2035 | 2,123,371 | 0.99% | 20,893 |
Name | 2024 Population | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,315 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,678 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,355 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,342 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,336 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,216 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,435 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,135 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,085 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,818 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,133 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,654 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,982 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,301 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,169 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,342 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,567 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,005 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,772 | 1.35% |