Orizaba's 2024 population is now estimated at 498,949. In 1950, the population of Orizaba was 99,646. Orizaba has grown by 6,279 in the last year, which represents a 1.27% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Orizaba, which typically includes Orizaba's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 566,334 |
| 2034 | 560,766 |
| 2033 | 555,065 |
| 2032 | 549,235 |
| 2031 | 543,282 |
| 2030 | 537,212 |
| 2029 | 531,040 |
| 2028 | 524,786 |
| 2027 | 518,479 |
| 2026 | 511,937 |
| 2025 | 505,396 |
| 2024 | 498,949 |
| 2023 | 492,670 |
| 2022 | 486,619 |
| 2021 | 480,844 |
| 2020 | 475,360 |
| 2019 | 470,152 |
| 2018 | 465,166 |
| 2017 | 460,327 |
| 2016 | 455,538 |
| 2015 | 450,785 |
| 2014 | 446,088 |
| 2013 | 441,441 |
| 2012 | 436,848 |
| 2011 | 432,290 |
| 2010 | 427,786 |
| 2009 | 423,132 |
| 2008 | 418,517 |
| 2007 | 413,939 |
| 2006 | 409,418 |
| 2005 | 404,946 |
| 2004 | 400,529 |
| 2003 | 396,148 |
| 2002 | 391,821 |
| 2001 | 387,541 |
| 2000 | 383,314 |
| 1999 | 378,166 |
| 1998 | 372,525 |
| 1997 | 366,969 |
| 1996 | 361,504 |
| 1995 | 356,105 |
| 1994 | 350,794 |
| 1993 | 345,562 |
| 1992 | 340,415 |
| 1991 | 335,331 |
| 1990 | 330,330 |
| 1989 | 318,753 |
| 1988 | 304,908 |
| 1987 | 291,629 |
| 1986 | 278,945 |
| 1985 | 266,813 |
| 1984 | 255,224 |
| 1983 | 244,108 |
| 1982 | 233,491 |
| 1981 | 223,336 |
| 1980 | 213,636 |
| 1979 | 210,933 |
| 1978 | 208,794 |
| 1977 | 206,677 |
| 1976 | 204,585 |
| 1975 | 202,507 |
| 1974 | 200,454 |
| 1973 | 198,422 |
| 1972 | 196,413 |
| 1971 | 194,419 |
| 1970 | 192,448 |
| 1969 | 186,773 |
| 1968 | 178,684 |
| 1967 | 170,925 |
| 1966 | 163,512 |
| 1965 | 156,421 |
| 1964 | 149,647 |
| 1963 | 143,148 |
| 1962 | 136,940 |
| 1961 | 131,001 |
| 1960 | 125,328 |
| 1959 | 122,334 |
| 1958 | 119,577 |
| 1957 | 116,883 |
| 1956 | 114,252 |
| 1955 | 111,674 |
| 1954 | 109,158 |
| 1953 | 106,698 |
| 1952 | 104,297 |
| 1951 | 101,944 |
| 1950 | 99,646 |
Year | Population | Growth Rate | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 99,646 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 101,944 | 2.31% | 2,298 |
| 1952 | 104,297 | 2.31% | 2,353 |
| 1953 | 106,698 | 2.3% | 2,401 |
| 1954 | 109,158 | 2.31% | 2,460 |
| 1955 | 111,674 | 2.3% | 2,516 |
| 1956 | 114,252 | 2.31% | 2,578 |
| 1957 | 116,883 | 2.3% | 2,631 |
| 1958 | 119,577 | 2.3% | 2,694 |
| 1959 | 122,334 | 2.31% | 2,757 |
| 1960 | 125,328 | 2.45% | 2,994 |
| 1961 | 131,001 | 4.53% | 5,673 |
| 1962 | 136,940 | 4.53% | 5,939 |
| 1963 | 143,148 | 4.53% | 6,208 |
| 1964 | 149,647 | 4.54% | 6,499 |
| 1965 | 156,421 | 4.53% | 6,774 |
| 1966 | 163,512 | 4.53% | 7,091 |
| 1967 | 170,925 | 4.53% | 7,413 |
| 1968 | 178,684 | 4.54% | 7,759 |
| 1969 | 186,773 | 4.53% | 8,089 |
| 1970 | 192,448 | 3.04% | 5,675 |
| 1971 | 194,419 | 1.02% | 1,971 |
| 1972 | 196,413 | 1.03% | 1,994 |
| 1973 | 198,422 | 1.02% | 2,009 |
| 1974 | 200,454 | 1.02% | 2,032 |
| 1975 | 202,507 | 1.02% | 2,053 |
| 1976 | 204,585 | 1.03% | 2,078 |
| 1977 | 206,677 | 1.02% | 2,092 |
| 1978 | 208,794 | 1.02% | 2,117 |
| 1979 | 210,933 | 1.02% | 2,139 |
| 1980 | 213,636 | 1.28% | 2,703 |
| 1981 | 223,336 | 4.54% | 9,700 |
| 1982 | 233,491 | 4.55% | 10,155 |
| 1983 | 244,108 | 4.55% | 10,617 |
| 1984 | 255,224 | 4.55% | 11,116 |
| 1985 | 266,813 | 4.54% | 11,589 |
| 1986 | 278,945 | 4.55% | 12,132 |
| 1987 | 291,629 | 4.55% | 12,684 |
| 1988 | 304,908 | 4.55% | 13,279 |
| 1989 | 318,753 | 4.54% | 13,845 |
| 1990 | 330,330 | 3.63% | 11,577 |
| 1991 | 335,331 | 1.51% | 5,001 |
| 1992 | 340,415 | 1.52% | 5,084 |
| 1993 | 345,562 | 1.51% | 5,147 |
| 1994 | 350,794 | 1.51% | 5,232 |
| 1995 | 356,105 | 1.51% | 5,311 |
| 1996 | 361,504 | 1.52% | 5,399 |
| 1997 | 366,969 | 1.51% | 5,465 |
| 1998 | 372,525 | 1.51% | 5,556 |
| 1999 | 378,166 | 1.51% | 5,641 |
| 2000 | 383,314 | 1.36% | 5,148 |
| 2001 | 387,541 | 1.1% | 4,227 |
| 2002 | 391,821 | 1.1% | 4,280 |
| 2003 | 396,148 | 1.1% | 4,327 |
| 2004 | 400,529 | 1.11% | 4,381 |
| 2005 | 404,946 | 1.1% | 4,417 |
| 2006 | 409,418 | 1.1% | 4,472 |
| 2007 | 413,939 | 1.1% | 4,521 |
| 2008 | 418,517 | 1.11% | 4,578 |
| 2009 | 423,132 | 1.1% | 4,615 |
| 2010 | 427,786 | 1.1% | 4,654 |
| 2011 | 432,290 | 1.05% | 4,504 |
| 2012 | 436,848 | 1.05% | 4,558 |
| 2013 | 441,441 | 1.05% | 4,593 |
| 2014 | 446,088 | 1.05% | 4,647 |
| 2015 | 450,785 | 1.05% | 4,697 |
| 2016 | 455,538 | 1.05% | 4,753 |
| 2017 | 460,327 | 1.05% | 4,789 |
| 2018 | 465,166 | 1.05% | 4,839 |
| 2019 | 470,152 | 1.07% | 4,986 |
| 2020 | 475,360 | 1.11% | 5,208 |
| 2021 | 480,844 | 1.15% | 5,484 |
| 2022 | 486,619 | 1.2% | 5,775 |
| 2023 | 492,670 | 1.24% | 6,051 |
| 2024 | 498,949 | 1.27% | 6,279 |
| 2025 | 505,396 | 1.29% | 6,447 |
| 2026 | 511,937 | 1.29% | 6,541 |
| 2027 | 518,479 | 1.28% | 6,542 |
| 2028 | 524,786 | 1.22% | 6,307 |
| 2029 | 531,040 | 1.19% | 6,254 |
| 2030 | 537,212 | 1.16% | 6,172 |
| 2031 | 543,282 | 1.13% | 6,070 |
| 2032 | 549,235 | 1.1% | 5,953 |
| 2033 | 555,065 | 1.06% | 5,830 |
| 2034 | 560,766 | 1.03% | 5,701 |
| 2035 | 566,334 | 0.99% | 5,568 |
Name | 2024 Population | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,315 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,678 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,355 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,342 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,336 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,216 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,435 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,135 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,085 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,818 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,133 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,654 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,982 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,301 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,169 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,342 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,567 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,005 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,772 | 1.35% |