Tampico's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,062,567. In 1950, the population of Tampico was 165,324. Tampico has grown by 15,316 in the last year, which represents a 1.46% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Tampico, which typically includes Tampico's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 1,210,365 |
| 2034 | 1,198,463 |
| 2033 | 1,186,275 |
| 2032 | 1,173,805 |
| 2031 | 1,161,058 |
| 2030 | 1,148,029 |
| 2029 | 1,134,724 |
| 2028 | 1,121,142 |
| 2027 | 1,107,283 |
| 2026 | 1,092,675 |
| 2025 | 1,077,736 |
| 2024 | 1,062,567 |
| 2023 | 1,047,251 |
| 2022 | 1,031,867 |
| 2021 | 1,016,514 |
| 2020 | 1,001,278 |
| 2019 | 986,228 |
| 2018 | 971,402 |
| 2017 | 956,814 |
| 2016 | 942,445 |
| 2015 | 928,253 |
| 2014 | 914,294 |
| 2013 | 900,545 |
| 2012 | 887,021 |
| 2011 | 873,664 |
| 2010 | 860,526 |
| 2009 | 848,713 |
| 2008 | 837,182 |
| 2007 | 825,776 |
| 2006 | 814,541 |
| 2005 | 803,458 |
| 2004 | 792,542 |
| 2003 | 781,744 |
| 2002 | 771,108 |
| 2001 | 760,617 |
| 2000 | 750,282 |
| 1999 | 739,849 |
| 1998 | 729,449 |
| 1997 | 719,196 |
| 1996 | 709,100 |
| 1995 | 699,119 |
| 1994 | 689,292 |
| 1993 | 679,603 |
| 1992 | 670,063 |
| 1991 | 660,632 |
| 1990 | 651,346 |
| 1989 | 639,582 |
| 1988 | 626,960 |
| 1987 | 614,553 |
| 1986 | 602,409 |
| 1985 | 590,505 |
| 1984 | 578,851 |
| 1983 | 567,397 |
| 1982 | 556,184 |
| 1981 | 545,193 |
| 1980 | 534,434 |
| 1979 | 516,741 |
| 1978 | 499,115 |
| 1977 | 482,090 |
| 1976 | 465,668 |
| 1975 | 449,763 |
| 1974 | 434,421 |
| 1973 | 419,603 |
| 1972 | 405,309 |
| 1971 | 391,465 |
| 1970 | 378,112 |
| 1969 | 361,190 |
| 1968 | 342,270 |
| 1967 | 324,293 |
| 1966 | 307,283 |
| 1965 | 291,166 |
| 1964 | 275,914 |
| 1963 | 261,423 |
| 1962 | 247,710 |
| 1961 | 234,718 |
| 1960 | 222,423 |
| 1959 | 215,616 |
| 1958 | 209,346 |
| 1957 | 203,258 |
| 1956 | 197,356 |
| 1955 | 191,609 |
| 1954 | 186,037 |
| 1953 | 180,627 |
| 1952 | 175,382 |
| 1951 | 170,275 |
| 1950 | 165,324 |
Year | Population | Growth Rate | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 165,324 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 170,275 | 2.99% | 4,951 |
| 1952 | 175,382 | 3% | 5,107 |
| 1953 | 180,627 | 2.99% | 5,245 |
| 1954 | 186,037 | 3% | 5,410 |
| 1955 | 191,609 | 3% | 5,572 |
| 1956 | 197,356 | 3% | 5,747 |
| 1957 | 203,258 | 2.99% | 5,902 |
| 1958 | 209,346 | 3% | 6,088 |
| 1959 | 215,616 | 3% | 6,270 |
| 1960 | 222,423 | 3.16% | 6,807 |
| 1961 | 234,718 | 5.53% | 12,295 |
| 1962 | 247,710 | 5.54% | 12,992 |
| 1963 | 261,423 | 5.54% | 13,713 |
| 1964 | 275,914 | 5.54% | 14,491 |
| 1965 | 291,166 | 5.53% | 15,252 |
| 1966 | 307,283 | 5.54% | 16,117 |
| 1967 | 324,293 | 5.54% | 17,010 |
| 1968 | 342,270 | 5.54% | 17,977 |
| 1969 | 361,190 | 5.53% | 18,920 |
| 1970 | 378,112 | 4.69% | 16,922 |
| 1971 | 391,465 | 3.53% | 13,353 |
| 1972 | 405,309 | 3.54% | 13,844 |
| 1973 | 419,603 | 3.53% | 14,294 |
| 1974 | 434,421 | 3.53% | 14,818 |
| 1975 | 449,763 | 3.53% | 15,342 |
| 1976 | 465,668 | 3.54% | 15,905 |
| 1977 | 482,090 | 3.53% | 16,422 |
| 1978 | 499,115 | 3.53% | 17,025 |
| 1979 | 516,741 | 3.53% | 17,626 |
| 1980 | 534,434 | 3.42% | 17,693 |
| 1981 | 545,193 | 2.01% | 10,759 |
| 1982 | 556,184 | 2.02% | 10,991 |
| 1983 | 567,397 | 2.02% | 11,213 |
| 1984 | 578,851 | 2.02% | 11,454 |
| 1985 | 590,505 | 2.01% | 11,654 |
| 1986 | 602,409 | 2.02% | 11,904 |
| 1987 | 614,553 | 2.02% | 12,144 |
| 1988 | 626,960 | 2.02% | 12,407 |
| 1989 | 639,582 | 2.01% | 12,622 |
| 1990 | 651,346 | 1.84% | 11,764 |
| 1991 | 660,632 | 1.43% | 9,286 |
| 1992 | 670,063 | 1.43% | 9,431 |
| 1993 | 679,603 | 1.42% | 9,540 |
| 1994 | 689,292 | 1.43% | 9,689 |
| 1995 | 699,119 | 1.43% | 9,827 |
| 1996 | 709,100 | 1.43% | 9,981 |
| 1997 | 719,196 | 1.42% | 10,096 |
| 1998 | 729,449 | 1.43% | 10,253 |
| 1999 | 739,849 | 1.43% | 10,400 |
| 2000 | 750,282 | 1.41% | 10,433 |
| 2001 | 760,617 | 1.38% | 10,335 |
| 2002 | 771,108 | 1.38% | 10,491 |
| 2003 | 781,744 | 1.38% | 10,636 |
| 2004 | 792,542 | 1.38% | 10,798 |
| 2005 | 803,458 | 1.38% | 10,916 |
| 2006 | 814,541 | 1.38% | 11,083 |
| 2007 | 825,776 | 1.38% | 11,235 |
| 2008 | 837,182 | 1.38% | 11,406 |
| 2009 | 848,713 | 1.38% | 11,531 |
| 2010 | 860,526 | 1.39% | 11,813 |
| 2011 | 873,664 | 1.53% | 13,138 |
| 2012 | 887,021 | 1.53% | 13,357 |
| 2013 | 900,545 | 1.52% | 13,524 |
| 2014 | 914,294 | 1.53% | 13,749 |
| 2015 | 928,253 | 1.53% | 13,959 |
| 2016 | 942,445 | 1.53% | 14,192 |
| 2017 | 956,814 | 1.52% | 14,369 |
| 2018 | 971,402 | 1.52% | 14,588 |
| 2019 | 986,228 | 1.53% | 14,826 |
| 2020 | 1,001,278 | 1.53% | 15,050 |
| 2021 | 1,016,514 | 1.52% | 15,236 |
| 2022 | 1,031,867 | 1.51% | 15,353 |
| 2023 | 1,047,251 | 1.49% | 15,384 |
| 2024 | 1,062,567 | 1.46% | 15,316 |
| 2025 | 1,077,736 | 1.43% | 15,169 |
| 2026 | 1,092,675 | 1.39% | 14,939 |
| 2027 | 1,107,283 | 1.34% | 14,608 |
| 2028 | 1,121,142 | 1.25% | 13,859 |
| 2029 | 1,134,724 | 1.21% | 13,582 |
| 2030 | 1,148,029 | 1.17% | 13,305 |
| 2031 | 1,161,058 | 1.13% | 13,029 |
| 2032 | 1,173,805 | 1.1% | 12,747 |
| 2033 | 1,186,275 | 1.06% | 12,470 |
| 2034 | 1,198,463 | 1.03% | 12,188 |
| 2035 | 1,210,365 | 0.99% | 11,902 |
Name | 2024 Population | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,315 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,678 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,355 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,342 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,336 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,216 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,435 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,135 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,085 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,818 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,133 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,654 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,982 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,301 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,169 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,342 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,567 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,005 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,772 | 1.35% |