Tshikapa's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,131,226. In 1950, the population of Tshikapa was 8,167. Tshikapa has grown by 54,118 in the last year, which represents a 5.02% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Tshikapa, which typically includes Tshikapa's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 1,792,691 |
| 2034 | 1,725,298 |
| 2033 | 1,659,532 |
| 2032 | 1,595,380 |
| 2031 | 1,532,923 |
| 2030 | 1,471,978 |
| 2029 | 1,412,504 |
| 2028 | 1,354,309 |
| 2027 | 1,297,305 |
| 2026 | 1,241,228 |
| 2025 | 1,185,918 |
| 2024 | 1,131,226 |
| 2023 | 1,077,108 |
| 2022 | 1,023,575 |
| 2021 | 970,831 |
| 2020 | 919,192 |
| 2019 | 869,060 |
| 2018 | 820,835 |
| 2017 | 774,895 |
| 2016 | 731,527 |
| 2015 | 690,586 |
| 2014 | 651,936 |
| 2013 | 615,449 |
| 2012 | 581,004 |
| 2011 | 548,487 |
| 2010 | 517,789 |
| 2009 | 488,811 |
| 2008 | 461,454 |
| 2007 | 435,628 |
| 2006 | 411,247 |
| 2005 | 388,231 |
| 2004 | 366,503 |
| 2003 | 345,991 |
| 2002 | 326,653 |
| 2001 | 308,396 |
| 2000 | 291,183 |
| 1999 | 274,886 |
| 1998 | 259,523 |
| 1997 | 245,018 |
| 1996 | 231,342 |
| 1995 | 218,394 |
| 1994 | 206,188 |
| 1993 | 194,664 |
| 1992 | 183,798 |
| 1991 | 173,512 |
| 1990 | 163,814 |
| 1989 | 154,658 |
| 1988 | 146,026 |
| 1987 | 137,853 |
| 1986 | 130,149 |
| 1985 | 122,874 |
| 1984 | 116,016 |
| 1983 | 107,294 |
| 1982 | 99,239 |
| 1981 | 91,788 |
| 1980 | 84,906 |
| 1979 | 78,523 |
| 1978 | 72,628 |
| 1977 | 67,175 |
| 1976 | 62,139 |
| 1975 | 57,467 |
| 1974 | 53,153 |
| 1973 | 49,162 |
| 1972 | 45,476 |
| 1971 | 42,058 |
| 1970 | 38,900 |
| 1969 | 35,980 |
| 1968 | 33,282 |
| 1967 | 30,780 |
| 1966 | 28,469 |
| 1965 | 26,332 |
| 1964 | 24,357 |
| 1963 | 22,526 |
| 1962 | 20,835 |
| 1961 | 19,271 |
| 1960 | 17,826 |
| 1959 | 16,486 |
| 1958 | 15,248 |
| 1957 | 14,103 |
| 1956 | 13,046 |
| 1955 | 12,065 |
| 1954 | 11,159 |
| 1953 | 10,322 |
| 1952 | 9,548 |
| 1951 | 8,830 |
| 1950 | 8,167 |
Year | Population | Growth Rate | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 8,167 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 8,830 | 8.12% | 663 |
| 1952 | 9,548 | 8.13% | 718 |
| 1953 | 10,322 | 8.11% | 774 |
| 1954 | 11,159 | 8.11% | 837 |
| 1955 | 12,065 | 8.12% | 906 |
| 1956 | 13,046 | 8.13% | 981 |
| 1957 | 14,103 | 8.1% | 1,057 |
| 1958 | 15,248 | 8.12% | 1,145 |
| 1959 | 16,486 | 8.12% | 1,238 |
| 1960 | 17,826 | 8.13% | 1,340 |
| 1961 | 19,271 | 8.11% | 1,445 |
| 1962 | 20,835 | 8.12% | 1,564 |
| 1963 | 22,526 | 8.12% | 1,691 |
| 1964 | 24,357 | 8.13% | 1,831 |
| 1965 | 26,332 | 8.11% | 1,975 |
| 1966 | 28,469 | 8.12% | 2,137 |
| 1967 | 30,780 | 8.12% | 2,311 |
| 1968 | 33,282 | 8.13% | 2,502 |
| 1969 | 35,980 | 8.11% | 2,698 |
| 1970 | 38,900 | 8.12% | 2,920 |
| 1971 | 42,058 | 8.12% | 3,158 |
| 1972 | 45,476 | 8.13% | 3,418 |
| 1973 | 49,162 | 8.11% | 3,686 |
| 1974 | 53,153 | 8.12% | 3,991 |
| 1975 | 57,467 | 8.12% | 4,314 |
| 1976 | 62,139 | 8.13% | 4,672 |
| 1977 | 67,175 | 8.1% | 5,036 |
| 1978 | 72,628 | 8.12% | 5,453 |
| 1979 | 78,523 | 8.12% | 5,895 |
| 1980 | 84,906 | 8.13% | 6,383 |
| 1981 | 91,788 | 8.11% | 6,882 |
| 1982 | 99,239 | 8.12% | 7,451 |
| 1983 | 107,294 | 8.12% | 8,055 |
| 1984 | 116,016 | 8.13% | 8,722 |
| 1985 | 122,874 | 5.91% | 6,858 |
| 1986 | 130,149 | 5.92% | 7,275 |
| 1987 | 137,853 | 5.92% | 7,704 |
| 1988 | 146,026 | 5.93% | 8,173 |
| 1989 | 154,658 | 5.91% | 8,632 |
| 1990 | 163,814 | 5.92% | 9,156 |
| 1991 | 173,512 | 5.92% | 9,698 |
| 1992 | 183,798 | 5.93% | 10,286 |
| 1993 | 194,664 | 5.91% | 10,866 |
| 1994 | 206,188 | 5.92% | 11,524 |
| 1995 | 218,394 | 5.92% | 12,206 |
| 1996 | 231,342 | 5.93% | 12,948 |
| 1997 | 245,018 | 5.91% | 13,676 |
| 1998 | 259,523 | 5.92% | 14,505 |
| 1999 | 274,886 | 5.92% | 15,363 |
| 2000 | 291,183 | 5.93% | 16,297 |
| 2001 | 308,396 | 5.91% | 17,213 |
| 2002 | 326,653 | 5.92% | 18,257 |
| 2003 | 345,991 | 5.92% | 19,338 |
| 2004 | 366,503 | 5.93% | 20,512 |
| 2005 | 388,231 | 5.93% | 21,728 |
| 2006 | 411,247 | 5.93% | 23,016 |
| 2007 | 435,628 | 5.93% | 24,381 |
| 2008 | 461,454 | 5.93% | 25,826 |
| 2009 | 488,811 | 5.93% | 27,357 |
| 2010 | 517,789 | 5.93% | 28,978 |
| 2011 | 548,487 | 5.93% | 30,698 |
| 2012 | 581,004 | 5.93% | 32,517 |
| 2013 | 615,449 | 5.93% | 34,445 |
| 2014 | 651,936 | 5.93% | 36,487 |
| 2015 | 690,586 | 5.93% | 38,650 |
| 2016 | 731,527 | 5.93% | 40,941 |
| 2017 | 774,895 | 5.93% | 43,368 |
| 2018 | 820,835 | 5.93% | 45,940 |
| 2019 | 869,060 | 5.88% | 48,225 |
| 2020 | 919,192 | 5.77% | 50,132 |
| 2021 | 970,831 | 5.62% | 51,639 |
| 2022 | 1,023,575 | 5.43% | 52,744 |
| 2023 | 1,077,108 | 5.23% | 53,533 |
| 2024 | 1,131,226 | 5.02% | 54,118 |
| 2025 | 1,185,918 | 4.83% | 54,692 |
| 2026 | 1,241,228 | 4.66% | 55,310 |
| 2027 | 1,297,305 | 4.52% | 56,077 |
| 2028 | 1,354,309 | 4.39% | 57,004 |
| 2029 | 1,412,504 | 4.3% | 58,195 |
| 2030 | 1,471,978 | 4.21% | 59,474 |
| 2031 | 1,532,923 | 4.14% | 60,945 |
| 2032 | 1,595,380 | 4.07% | 62,457 |
| 2033 | 1,659,532 | 4.02% | 64,152 |
| 2034 | 1,725,298 | 3.96% | 65,766 |
| 2035 | 1,792,691 | 3.91% | 67,393 |
Name | 2024 Population | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Kinshasa | 17,032,322 | 4.39% |
| Mbuji Mayi | 3,022,855 | 4.53% |
| Lubumbashi | 2,933,962 | 4.34% |
| Kananga | 1,738,716 | 4.46% |
| Kisangani | 1,483,513 | 4.22% |
| Bukavu | 1,308,469 | 4.78% |
| Tshikapa | 1,131,226 | 5.02% |
| Bunia | 856,339 | 5.45% |
| Goma | 781,875 | 5.06% |
| Uvira | 725,768 | 5.02% |
| Likasi | 650,465 | 3.76% |
| Kabinda | 606,380 | 6.03% |
| Kikwit | 590,797 | 4.04% |
| Kolwezi | 537,536 | 2.84% |
| Mbandaka | 513,977 | 3.98% |
| Matadi | 448,004 | 3.82% |