Srinagar's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,737,500. In 1950, the population of Srinagar was 252,719. Srinagar has grown by 39,220 in the last year, which represents a 2.31% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Srinagar, which typically includes Srinagar's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 2,214,410 |
| 2034 | 2,168,820 |
| 2033 | 2,123,460 |
| 2032 | 2,078,410 |
| 2031 | 2,033,770 |
| 2030 | 1,989,580 |
| 2029 | 1,945,890 |
| 2028 | 1,902,780 |
| 2027 | 1,860,310 |
| 2026 | 1,818,570 |
| 2025 | 1,777,610 |
| 2024 | 1,737,500 |
| 2023 | 1,698,280 |
| 2022 | 1,659,940 |
| 2021 | 1,622,450 |
| 2020 | 1,585,770 |
| 2019 | 1,549,800 |
| 2018 | 1,514,500 |
| 2017 | 1,477,660 |
| 2016 | 1,441,710 |
| 2015 | 1,406,630 |
| 2014 | 1,372,410 |
| 2013 | 1,339,020 |
| 2012 | 1,306,440 |
| 2011 | 1,274,650 |
| 2010 | 1,243,640 |
| 2009 | 1,213,380 |
| 2008 | 1,183,900 |
| 2007 | 1,155,060 |
| 2006 | 1,126,960 |
| 2005 | 1,099,540 |
| 2004 | 1,072,830 |
| 2003 | 1,046,690 |
| 2002 | 1,021,220 |
| 2001 | 996,379 |
| 2000 | 972,859 |
| 1999 | 950,171 |
| 1998 | 928,043 |
| 1997 | 906,429 |
| 1996 | 885,348 |
| 1995 | 864,701 |
| 1994 | 844,563 |
| 1993 | 824,893 |
| 1992 | 805,708 |
| 1991 | 786,919 |
| 1990 | 768,592 |
| 1989 | 750,692 |
| 1988 | 733,233 |
| 1987 | 716,133 |
| 1986 | 699,455 |
| 1985 | 683,165 |
| 1984 | 667,276 |
| 1983 | 651,715 |
| 1982 | 636,537 |
| 1981 | 621,713 |
| 1980 | 602,272 |
| 1979 | 580,970 |
| 1978 | 560,449 |
| 1977 | 540,652 |
| 1976 | 521,581 |
| 1975 | 503,133 |
| 1974 | 485,361 |
| 1973 | 468,217 |
| 1972 | 451,701 |
| 1971 | 435,724 |
| 1970 | 420,013 |
| 1969 | 404,767 |
| 1968 | 390,094 |
| 1967 | 375,914 |
| 1966 | 362,268 |
| 1965 | 349,118 |
| 1964 | 336,462 |
| 1963 | 324,232 |
| 1962 | 312,462 |
| 1961 | 301,120 |
| 1960 | 294,452 |
| 1959 | 290,032 |
| 1958 | 285,685 |
| 1957 | 281,403 |
| 1956 | 277,191 |
| 1955 | 273,030 |
| 1954 | 268,938 |
| 1953 | 264,907 |
| 1952 | 260,942 |
| 1951 | 257,024 |
| 1950 | 252,719 |
Year | Population | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 252,719 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 257,024 | 1.7% | 4,305 |
| 1952 | 260,942 | 1.52% | 3,918 |
| 1953 | 264,907 | 1.52% | 3,965 |
| 1954 | 268,938 | 1.52% | 4,031 |
| 1955 | 273,030 | 1.52% | 4,092 |
| 1956 | 277,191 | 1.52% | 4,161 |
| 1957 | 281,403 | 1.52% | 4,212 |
| 1958 | 285,685 | 1.52% | 4,282 |
| 1959 | 290,032 | 1.52% | 4,347 |
| 1960 | 294,452 | 1.52% | 4,420 |
| 1961 | 301,120 | 2.26% | 6,668 |
| 1962 | 312,462 | 3.77% | 11,342 |
| 1963 | 324,232 | 3.77% | 11,770 |
| 1964 | 336,462 | 3.77% | 12,230 |
| 1965 | 349,118 | 3.76% | 12,656 |
| 1966 | 362,268 | 3.77% | 13,150 |
| 1967 | 375,914 | 3.77% | 13,646 |
| 1968 | 390,094 | 3.77% | 14,180 |
| 1969 | 404,767 | 3.76% | 14,673 |
| 1970 | 420,013 | 3.77% | 15,246 |
| 1971 | 435,724 | 3.74% | 15,711 |
| 1972 | 451,701 | 3.67% | 15,977 |
| 1973 | 468,217 | 3.66% | 16,516 |
| 1974 | 485,361 | 3.66% | 17,144 |
| 1975 | 503,133 | 3.66% | 17,772 |
| 1976 | 521,581 | 3.67% | 18,448 |
| 1977 | 540,652 | 3.66% | 19,071 |
| 1978 | 560,449 | 3.66% | 19,797 |
| 1979 | 580,970 | 3.66% | 20,521 |
| 1980 | 602,272 | 3.67% | 21,302 |
| 1981 | 621,713 | 3.23% | 19,441 |
| 1982 | 636,537 | 2.38% | 14,824 |
| 1983 | 651,715 | 2.38% | 15,178 |
| 1984 | 667,276 | 2.39% | 15,561 |
| 1985 | 683,165 | 2.38% | 15,889 |
| 1986 | 699,455 | 2.38% | 16,290 |
| 1987 | 716,133 | 2.38% | 16,678 |
| 1988 | 733,233 | 2.39% | 17,100 |
| 1989 | 750,692 | 2.38% | 17,459 |
| 1990 | 768,592 | 2.38% | 17,900 |
| 1991 | 786,919 | 2.38% | 18,327 |
| 1992 | 805,708 | 2.39% | 18,789 |
| 1993 | 824,893 | 2.38% | 19,185 |
| 1994 | 844,563 | 2.38% | 19,670 |
| 1995 | 864,701 | 2.38% | 20,138 |
| 1996 | 885,348 | 2.39% | 20,647 |
| 1997 | 906,429 | 2.38% | 21,081 |
| 1998 | 928,043 | 2.38% | 21,614 |
| 1999 | 950,171 | 2.38% | 22,128 |
| 2000 | 972,859 | 2.39% | 22,688 |
| 2001 | 996,379 | 2.42% | 23,520 |
| 2002 | 1,021,220 | 2.49% | 24,841 |
| 2003 | 1,046,690 | 2.49% | 25,470 |
| 2004 | 1,072,830 | 2.5% | 26,140 |
| 2005 | 1,099,540 | 2.49% | 26,710 |
| 2006 | 1,126,960 | 2.49% | 27,420 |
| 2007 | 1,155,060 | 2.49% | 28,100 |
| 2008 | 1,183,900 | 2.5% | 28,840 |
| 2009 | 1,213,380 | 2.49% | 29,480 |
| 2010 | 1,243,640 | 2.49% | 30,260 |
| 2011 | 1,274,650 | 2.49% | 31,010 |
| 2012 | 1,306,440 | 2.49% | 31,790 |
| 2013 | 1,339,020 | 2.49% | 32,580 |
| 2014 | 1,372,410 | 2.49% | 33,390 |
| 2015 | 1,406,630 | 2.49% | 34,220 |
| 2016 | 1,441,710 | 2.49% | 35,080 |
| 2017 | 1,477,660 | 2.49% | 35,950 |
| 2018 | 1,514,500 | 2.49% | 36,840 |
| 2019 | 1,549,800 | 2.33% | 35,300 |
| 2020 | 1,585,770 | 2.32% | 35,970 |
| 2021 | 1,622,450 | 2.31% | 36,680 |
| 2022 | 1,659,940 | 2.31% | 37,490 |
| 2023 | 1,698,280 | 2.31% | 38,340 |
| 2024 | 1,737,500 | 2.31% | 39,220 |
| 2025 | 1,777,610 | 2.31% | 40,110 |
| 2026 | 1,818,570 | 2.3% | 40,960 |
| 2027 | 1,860,310 | 2.3% | 41,740 |
| 2028 | 1,902,780 | 2.28% | 42,470 |
| 2029 | 1,945,890 | 2.27% | 43,110 |
| 2030 | 1,989,580 | 2.25% | 43,690 |
| 2031 | 2,033,770 | 2.22% | 44,190 |
| 2032 | 2,078,410 | 2.19% | 44,640 |
| 2033 | 2,123,460 | 2.17% | 45,050 |
| 2034 | 2,168,820 | 2.14% | 45,360 |
| 2035 | 2,214,410 | 2.1% | 45,590 |
Name | 2024 Pop. | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Delhi | 33,807,400 | 2.63% |
| Mumbai | 21,673,100 | 1.77% |
| Kolkata | 15,570,800 | 1.55% |
| Bangalore | 14,008,300 | 2.94% |
| Chennai | 12,053,700 | 2.36% |
| Hyderabad | 11,068,900 | 2.48% |
| Ahmedabad | 8,854,440 | 2.36% |
| Surat | 8,330,530 | 3.29% |
| Pune | 7,345,850 | 2.5% |
| Jaipur | 4,308,510 | 2.41% |
| Kozhikode | 4,243,960 | 3.8% |
| Malappuram | 4,184,920 | 4.39% |
| Lucknow | 4,038,210 | 2.35% |
| Thrissur | 3,605,240 | 3.53% |
| Kochi | 3,507,050 | 2.97% |
| Indore | 3,393,380 | 2.76% |
| Kanpur | 3,286,140 | 1.61% |
| Nagpur | 3,106,340 | 1.96% |
| Coimbatore | 3,083,720 | 2.48% |
| Thiruvananthapuram | 2,984,150 | 3.22% |