Aguascalientes's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,179,300. In 1950, the population of Aguascalientes was 93,553. Aguascalientes has grown by 17,850 in the last year, which represents a 1.54% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Aguascalientes, which typically includes Aguascalientes's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 1,345,230 |
| 2034 | 1,332,000 |
| 2033 | 1,318,450 |
| 2032 | 1,304,590 |
| 2031 | 1,290,410 |
| 2030 | 1,275,910 |
| 2029 | 1,261,070 |
| 2028 | 1,245,880 |
| 2027 | 1,230,310 |
| 2026 | 1,213,800 |
| 2025 | 1,196,770 |
| 2024 | 1,179,300 |
| 2023 | 1,161,450 |
| 2022 | 1,143,280 |
| 2021 | 1,124,910 |
| 2020 | 1,106,450 |
| 2019 | 1,088,040 |
| 2018 | 1,069,780 |
| 2017 | 1,051,770 |
| 2016 | 1,034,050 |
| 2015 | 1,016,590 |
| 2014 | 999,448 |
| 2013 | 982,594 |
| 2012 | 966,046 |
| 2011 | 949,733 |
| 2010 | 933,717 |
| 2009 | 915,316 |
| 2008 | 897,061 |
| 2007 | 879,121 |
| 2006 | 861,564 |
| 2005 | 844,358 |
| 2004 | 827,518 |
| 2003 | 810,969 |
| 2002 | 794,773 |
| 2001 | 778,901 |
| 2000 | 763,366 |
| 1999 | 742,245 |
| 1998 | 718,323 |
| 1997 | 695,173 |
| 1996 | 672,799 |
| 1995 | 651,086 |
| 1994 | 630,103 |
| 1993 | 609,795 |
| 1992 | 590,169 |
| 1991 | 571,123 |
| 1990 | 552,717 |
| 1989 | 523,354 |
| 1988 | 491,009 |
| 1987 | 460,583 |
| 1986 | 432,080 |
| 1985 | 405,341 |
| 1984 | 380,290 |
| 1983 | 356,724 |
| 1982 | 334,649 |
| 1981 | 313,939 |
| 1980 | 294,537 |
| 1979 | 280,791 |
| 1978 | 268,048 |
| 1977 | 255,884 |
| 1976 | 244,287 |
| 1975 | 233,186 |
| 1974 | 222,604 |
| 1973 | 212,502 |
| 1972 | 202,871 |
| 1971 | 193,652 |
| 1970 | 184,864 |
| 1969 | 177,417 |
| 1968 | 170,943 |
| 1967 | 164,688 |
| 1966 | 158,669 |
| 1965 | 152,871 |
| 1964 | 147,292 |
| 1963 | 141,902 |
| 1962 | 136,717 |
| 1961 | 131,721 |
| 1960 | 126,914 |
| 1959 | 123,050 |
| 1958 | 119,359 |
| 1957 | 115,779 |
| 1956 | 112,311 |
| 1955 | 108,938 |
| 1954 | 105,671 |
| 1953 | 102,502 |
| 1952 | 99,432 |
| 1951 | 96,446 |
| 1950 | 93,553 |
Year | Population | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 93,553 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 96,446 | 3.09% | 2,893 |
| 1952 | 99,432 | 3.1% | 2,986 |
| 1953 | 102,502 | 3.09% | 3,070 |
| 1954 | 105,671 | 3.09% | 3,169 |
| 1955 | 108,938 | 3.09% | 3,267 |
| 1956 | 112,311 | 3.1% | 3,373 |
| 1957 | 115,779 | 3.09% | 3,468 |
| 1958 | 119,359 | 3.09% | 3,580 |
| 1959 | 123,050 | 3.09% | 3,691 |
| 1960 | 126,914 | 3.14% | 3,864 |
| 1961 | 131,721 | 3.79% | 4,807 |
| 1962 | 136,717 | 3.79% | 4,996 |
| 1963 | 141,902 | 3.79% | 5,185 |
| 1964 | 147,292 | 3.8% | 5,390 |
| 1965 | 152,871 | 3.79% | 5,579 |
| 1966 | 158,669 | 3.79% | 5,798 |
| 1967 | 164,688 | 3.79% | 6,019 |
| 1968 | 170,943 | 3.8% | 6,255 |
| 1969 | 177,417 | 3.79% | 6,474 |
| 1970 | 184,864 | 4.2% | 7,447 |
| 1971 | 193,652 | 4.75% | 8,788 |
| 1972 | 202,871 | 4.76% | 9,219 |
| 1973 | 212,502 | 4.75% | 9,631 |
| 1974 | 222,604 | 4.75% | 10,102 |
| 1975 | 233,186 | 4.75% | 10,582 |
| 1976 | 244,287 | 4.76% | 11,101 |
| 1977 | 255,884 | 4.75% | 11,597 |
| 1978 | 268,048 | 4.75% | 12,164 |
| 1979 | 280,791 | 4.75% | 12,743 |
| 1980 | 294,537 | 4.9% | 13,746 |
| 1981 | 313,939 | 6.59% | 19,402 |
| 1982 | 334,649 | 6.6% | 20,710 |
| 1983 | 356,724 | 6.6% | 22,075 |
| 1984 | 380,290 | 6.61% | 23,566 |
| 1985 | 405,341 | 6.59% | 25,051 |
| 1986 | 432,080 | 6.6% | 26,739 |
| 1987 | 460,583 | 6.6% | 28,503 |
| 1988 | 491,009 | 6.61% | 30,426 |
| 1989 | 523,354 | 6.59% | 32,345 |
| 1990 | 552,717 | 5.61% | 29,363 |
| 1991 | 571,123 | 3.33% | 18,406 |
| 1992 | 590,169 | 3.33% | 19,046 |
| 1993 | 609,795 | 3.33% | 19,626 |
| 1994 | 630,103 | 3.33% | 20,308 |
| 1995 | 651,086 | 3.33% | 20,983 |
| 1996 | 672,799 | 3.33% | 21,713 |
| 1997 | 695,173 | 3.33% | 22,374 |
| 1998 | 718,323 | 3.33% | 23,150 |
| 1999 | 742,245 | 3.33% | 23,922 |
| 2000 | 763,366 | 2.85% | 21,121 |
| 2001 | 778,901 | 2.04% | 15,535 |
| 2002 | 794,773 | 2.04% | 15,872 |
| 2003 | 810,969 | 2.04% | 16,196 |
| 2004 | 827,518 | 2.04% | 16,549 |
| 2005 | 844,358 | 2.04% | 16,840 |
| 2006 | 861,564 | 2.04% | 17,206 |
| 2007 | 879,121 | 2.04% | 17,557 |
| 2008 | 897,061 | 2.04% | 17,940 |
| 2009 | 915,316 | 2.03% | 18,255 |
| 2010 | 933,717 | 2.01% | 18,401 |
| 2011 | 949,733 | 1.72% | 16,016 |
| 2012 | 966,046 | 1.72% | 16,313 |
| 2013 | 982,594 | 1.71% | 16,548 |
| 2014 | 999,448 | 1.72% | 16,854 |
| 2015 | 1,016,590 | 1.72% | 17,142 |
| 2016 | 1,034,050 | 1.72% | 17,460 |
| 2017 | 1,051,770 | 1.71% | 17,720 |
| 2018 | 1,069,780 | 1.71% | 18,010 |
| 2019 | 1,088,040 | 1.71% | 18,260 |
| 2020 | 1,106,450 | 1.69% | 18,410 |
| 2021 | 1,124,910 | 1.67% | 18,460 |
| 2022 | 1,143,280 | 1.63% | 18,370 |
| 2023 | 1,161,450 | 1.59% | 18,170 |
| 2024 | 1,179,300 | 1.54% | 17,850 |
| 2025 | 1,196,770 | 1.48% | 17,470 |
| 2026 | 1,213,800 | 1.42% | 17,030 |
| 2027 | 1,230,310 | 1.36% | 16,510 |
| 2028 | 1,245,880 | 1.27% | 15,570 |
| 2029 | 1,261,070 | 1.22% | 15,190 |
| 2030 | 1,275,910 | 1.18% | 14,840 |
| 2031 | 1,290,410 | 1.14% | 14,500 |
| 2032 | 1,304,590 | 1.1% | 14,180 |
| 2033 | 1,318,450 | 1.06% | 13,860 |
| 2034 | 1,332,000 | 1.03% | 13,550 |
| 2035 | 1,345,230 | 0.99% | 13,230 |
Name | 2024 Pop. | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,300 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,680 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,360 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,340 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,340 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,220 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,440 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,140 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,080 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,820 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,130 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,650 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,980 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,300 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,170 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,340 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,570 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,000 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,770 | 1.35% |