Tula's 2024 population is now estimated at 463,110. In 1950, the population of Tula was 234,803. Tula experienced a decrease of -1,599 residents over the past year, marking an annual decline of -0.34%.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Tula, which typically includes Tula's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 461,830 |
| 2034 | 461,583 |
| 2033 | 461,390 |
| 2032 | 461,233 |
| 2031 | 461,096 |
| 2030 | 460,979 |
| 2029 | 460,901 |
| 2028 | 460,903 |
| 2027 | 461,037 |
| 2026 | 461,381 |
| 2025 | 462,035 |
| 2024 | 463,110 |
| 2023 | 464,709 |
| 2022 | 466,906 |
| 2021 | 469,731 |
| 2020 | 473,159 |
| 2019 | 477,113 |
| 2018 | 481,463 |
| 2017 | 483,971 |
| 2016 | 486,492 |
| 2015 | 489,033 |
| 2014 | 491,583 |
| 2013 | 494,147 |
| 2012 | 496,721 |
| 2011 | 499,315 |
| 2010 | 500,103 |
| 2009 | 496,414 |
| 2008 | 492,757 |
| 2007 | 489,118 |
| 2006 | 485,510 |
| 2005 | 481,929 |
| 2004 | 478,379 |
| 2003 | 474,845 |
| 2002 | 473,568 |
| 2001 | 478,227 |
| 2000 | 482,925 |
| 1999 | 487,683 |
| 1998 | 492,480 |
| 1997 | 497,325 |
| 1996 | 502,211 |
| 1995 | 507,158 |
| 1994 | 512,147 |
| 1993 | 517,186 |
| 1992 | 522,265 |
| 1991 | 527,411 |
| 1990 | 532,600 |
| 1989 | 537,839 |
| 1988 | 538,861 |
| 1987 | 536,173 |
| 1986 | 533,503 |
| 1985 | 530,845 |
| 1984 | 528,204 |
| 1983 | 525,570 |
| 1982 | 522,952 |
| 1981 | 520,347 |
| 1980 | 517,758 |
| 1979 | 515,176 |
| 1978 | 510,706 |
| 1977 | 504,690 |
| 1976 | 498,752 |
| 1975 | 492,868 |
| 1974 | 487,062 |
| 1973 | 481,324 |
| 1972 | 475,661 |
| 1971 | 470,050 |
| 1970 | 464,512 |
| 1969 | 453,401 |
| 1968 | 437,988 |
| 1967 | 423,059 |
| 1966 | 408,658 |
| 1965 | 394,747 |
| 1964 | 381,328 |
| 1963 | 368,330 |
| 1962 | 355,791 |
| 1961 | 343,680 |
| 1960 | 331,997 |
| 1959 | 320,680 |
| 1958 | 309,764 |
| 1957 | 299,220 |
| 1956 | 289,048 |
| 1955 | 279,195 |
| 1954 | 269,692 |
| 1953 | 260,511 |
| 1952 | 251,655 |
| 1951 | 243,077 |
| 1950 | 234,803 |
Year | Population | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 234,803 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 243,077 | 3.52% | 8,274 |
| 1952 | 251,655 | 3.53% | 8,578 |
| 1953 | 260,511 | 3.52% | 8,856 |
| 1954 | 269,692 | 3.52% | 9,181 |
| 1955 | 279,195 | 3.52% | 9,503 |
| 1956 | 289,048 | 3.53% | 9,853 |
| 1957 | 299,220 | 3.52% | 10,172 |
| 1958 | 309,764 | 3.52% | 10,544 |
| 1959 | 320,680 | 3.52% | 10,916 |
| 1960 | 331,997 | 3.53% | 11,317 |
| 1961 | 343,680 | 3.52% | 11,683 |
| 1962 | 355,791 | 3.52% | 12,111 |
| 1963 | 368,330 | 3.52% | 12,539 |
| 1964 | 381,328 | 3.53% | 12,998 |
| 1965 | 394,747 | 3.52% | 13,419 |
| 1966 | 408,658 | 3.52% | 13,911 |
| 1967 | 423,059 | 3.52% | 14,401 |
| 1968 | 437,988 | 3.53% | 14,929 |
| 1969 | 453,401 | 3.52% | 15,413 |
| 1970 | 464,512 | 2.45% | 11,111 |
| 1971 | 470,050 | 1.19% | 5,538 |
| 1972 | 475,661 | 1.19% | 5,611 |
| 1973 | 481,324 | 1.19% | 5,663 |
| 1974 | 487,062 | 1.19% | 5,738 |
| 1975 | 492,868 | 1.19% | 5,806 |
| 1976 | 498,752 | 1.19% | 5,884 |
| 1977 | 504,690 | 1.19% | 5,938 |
| 1978 | 510,706 | 1.19% | 6,016 |
| 1979 | 515,176 | 0.88% | 4,470 |
| 1980 | 517,758 | 0.5% | 2,582 |
| 1981 | 520,347 | 0.5% | 2,589 |
| 1982 | 522,952 | 0.5% | 2,605 |
| 1983 | 525,570 | 0.5% | 2,618 |
| 1984 | 528,204 | 0.5% | 2,634 |
| 1985 | 530,845 | 0.5% | 2,641 |
| 1986 | 533,503 | 0.5% | 2,658 |
| 1987 | 536,173 | 0.5% | 2,670 |
| 1988 | 538,861 | 0.5% | 2,688 |
| 1989 | 537,839 | -0.19% | -1,022 |
| 1990 | 532,600 | -0.97% | -5,239 |
| 1991 | 527,411 | -0.97% | -5,189 |
| 1992 | 522,265 | -0.98% | -5,146 |
| 1993 | 517,186 | -0.97% | -5,079 |
| 1994 | 512,147 | -0.97% | -5,039 |
| 1995 | 507,158 | -0.97% | -4,989 |
| 1996 | 502,211 | -0.98% | -4,947 |
| 1997 | 497,325 | -0.97% | -4,886 |
| 1998 | 492,480 | -0.97% | -4,845 |
| 1999 | 487,683 | -0.97% | -4,797 |
| 2000 | 482,925 | -0.98% | -4,758 |
| 2001 | 478,227 | -0.97% | -4,698 |
| 2002 | 473,568 | -0.97% | -4,659 |
| 2003 | 474,845 | 0.27% | 1,277 |
| 2004 | 478,379 | 0.74% | 3,534 |
| 2005 | 481,929 | 0.74% | 3,550 |
| 2006 | 485,510 | 0.74% | 3,581 |
| 2007 | 489,118 | 0.74% | 3,608 |
| 2008 | 492,757 | 0.74% | 3,639 |
| 2009 | 496,414 | 0.74% | 3,657 |
| 2010 | 500,103 | 0.74% | 3,689 |
| 2011 | 499,315 | -0.16% | -788 |
| 2012 | 496,721 | -0.52% | -2,594 |
| 2013 | 494,147 | -0.52% | -2,574 |
| 2014 | 491,583 | -0.52% | -2,564 |
| 2015 | 489,033 | -0.52% | -2,550 |
| 2016 | 486,492 | -0.52% | -2,541 |
| 2017 | 483,971 | -0.52% | -2,521 |
| 2018 | 481,463 | -0.52% | -2,508 |
| 2019 | 477,113 | -0.9% | -4,350 |
| 2020 | 473,159 | -0.83% | -3,954 |
| 2021 | 469,731 | -0.72% | -3,428 |
| 2022 | 466,906 | -0.6% | -2,825 |
| 2023 | 464,709 | -0.47% | -2,197 |
| 2024 | 463,110 | -0.34% | -1,599 |
| 2025 | 462,035 | -0.23% | -1,075 |
| 2026 | 461,381 | -0.14% | -654 |
| 2027 | 461,037 | -0.07% | -344 |
| 2028 | 460,903 | -0.03% | -134 |
| 2029 | 460,901 | 0% | -2 |
| 2030 | 460,979 | 0.02% | 78 |
| 2031 | 461,096 | 0.03% | 117 |
| 2032 | 461,233 | 0.03% | 137 |
| 2033 | 461,390 | 0.03% | 157 |
| 2034 | 461,583 | 0.04% | 193 |
| 2035 | 461,830 | 0.05% | 247 |
Name | 2024 Pop. | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,300 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,680 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,360 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,340 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,340 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,220 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,440 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,140 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,080 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,820 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,130 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,650 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,980 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,300 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,170 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,340 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,570 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,000 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,770 | 1.35% |