Acapulco de Juarez's 2024 population is now estimated at 1,032,770. In 1950, the population of Acapulco de Juarez was 28,021. Acapulco de Juarez has grown by 13,790 in the last year, which represents a 1.35% annual change.These population estimates and projections come from the latest revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects. These estimates represent the Urban agglomeration of Acapulco de Juarez, which typically includes Acapulco de Juarez's population in addition to adjacent suburban areas.
Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2035 | 1,174,020 |
| 2034 | 1,162,480 |
| 2033 | 1,150,660 |
| 2032 | 1,138,570 |
| 2031 | 1,126,220 |
| 2030 | 1,113,610 |
| 2029 | 1,100,770 |
| 2028 | 1,087,710 |
| 2027 | 1,074,480 |
| 2026 | 1,060,660 |
| 2025 | 1,046,710 |
| 2024 | 1,032,770 |
| 2023 | 1,018,980 |
| 2022 | 1,005,420 |
| 2021 | 992,205 |
| 2020 | 979,381 |
| 2019 | 966,958 |
| 2018 | 954,889 |
| 2017 | 943,086 |
| 2016 | 931,429 |
| 2015 | 919,884 |
| 2014 | 908,498 |
| 2013 | 897,252 |
| 2012 | 886,162 |
| 2011 | 875,178 |
| 2010 | 864,345 |
| 2009 | 856,784 |
| 2008 | 849,588 |
| 2007 | 842,433 |
| 2006 | 835,349 |
| 2005 | 828,323 |
| 2004 | 821,367 |
| 2003 | 814,450 |
| 2002 | 807,600 |
| 2001 | 800,808 |
| 2000 | 794,083 |
| 1999 | 782,106 |
| 1998 | 767,200 |
| 1997 | 752,579 |
| 1996 | 738,256 |
| 1995 | 724,167 |
| 1994 | 710,366 |
| 1993 | 696,828 |
| 1992 | 683,566 |
| 1991 | 670,520 |
| 1990 | 657,742 |
| 1989 | 618,686 |
| 1988 | 571,704 |
| 1987 | 528,174 |
| 1986 | 488,013 |
| 1985 | 450,904 |
| 1984 | 416,663 |
| 1983 | 384,939 |
| 1982 | 355,668 |
| 1981 | 328,624 |
| 1980 | 303,668 |
| 1979 | 287,409 |
| 1978 | 272,564 |
| 1977 | 258,486 |
| 1976 | 245,152 |
| 1975 | 232,472 |
| 1974 | 220,465 |
| 1973 | 209,077 |
| 1972 | 198,292 |
| 1971 | 188,036 |
| 1970 | 178,324 |
| 1969 | 161,625 |
| 1968 | 141,754 |
| 1967 | 124,280 |
| 1966 | 108,980 |
| 1965 | 95,564 |
| 1964 | 83,814 |
| 1963 | 73,483 |
| 1962 | 64,436 |
| 1961 | 56,504 |
| 1960 | 49,556 |
| 1959 | 46,609 |
| 1958 | 44,047 |
| 1957 | 41,626 |
| 1956 | 39,341 |
| 1955 | 37,175 |
| 1954 | 35,132 |
| 1953 | 33,201 |
| 1952 | 31,378 |
| 1951 | 29,651 |
| 1950 | 28,021 |
Year | Population | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 28,021 | 0% | 0 |
| 1951 | 29,651 | 5.82% | 1,630 |
| 1952 | 31,378 | 5.82% | 1,727 |
| 1953 | 33,201 | 5.81% | 1,823 |
| 1954 | 35,132 | 5.82% | 1,931 |
| 1955 | 37,175 | 5.82% | 2,043 |
| 1956 | 39,341 | 5.83% | 2,166 |
| 1957 | 41,626 | 5.81% | 2,285 |
| 1958 | 44,047 | 5.82% | 2,421 |
| 1959 | 46,609 | 5.82% | 2,562 |
| 1960 | 49,556 | 6.32% | 2,947 |
| 1961 | 56,504 | 14.02% | 6,948 |
| 1962 | 64,436 | 14.04% | 7,932 |
| 1963 | 73,483 | 14.04% | 9,047 |
| 1964 | 83,814 | 14.06% | 10,331 |
| 1965 | 95,564 | 14.02% | 11,750 |
| 1966 | 108,980 | 14.04% | 13,416 |
| 1967 | 124,280 | 14.04% | 15,300 |
| 1968 | 141,754 | 14.06% | 17,474 |
| 1969 | 161,625 | 14.02% | 19,871 |
| 1970 | 178,324 | 10.33% | 16,699 |
| 1971 | 188,036 | 5.45% | 9,712 |
| 1972 | 198,292 | 5.45% | 10,256 |
| 1973 | 209,077 | 5.44% | 10,785 |
| 1974 | 220,465 | 5.45% | 11,388 |
| 1975 | 232,472 | 5.45% | 12,007 |
| 1976 | 245,152 | 5.45% | 12,680 |
| 1977 | 258,486 | 5.44% | 13,334 |
| 1978 | 272,564 | 5.45% | 14,078 |
| 1979 | 287,409 | 5.45% | 14,845 |
| 1980 | 303,668 | 5.66% | 16,259 |
| 1981 | 328,624 | 8.22% | 24,956 |
| 1982 | 355,668 | 8.23% | 27,044 |
| 1983 | 384,939 | 8.23% | 29,271 |
| 1984 | 416,663 | 8.24% | 31,724 |
| 1985 | 450,904 | 8.22% | 34,241 |
| 1986 | 488,013 | 8.23% | 37,109 |
| 1987 | 528,174 | 8.23% | 40,161 |
| 1988 | 571,704 | 8.24% | 43,530 |
| 1989 | 618,686 | 8.22% | 46,982 |
| 1990 | 657,742 | 6.31% | 39,056 |
| 1991 | 670,520 | 1.94% | 12,778 |
| 1992 | 683,566 | 1.95% | 13,046 |
| 1993 | 696,828 | 1.94% | 13,262 |
| 1994 | 710,366 | 1.94% | 13,538 |
| 1995 | 724,167 | 1.94% | 13,801 |
| 1996 | 738,256 | 1.95% | 14,089 |
| 1997 | 752,579 | 1.94% | 14,323 |
| 1998 | 767,200 | 1.94% | 14,621 |
| 1999 | 782,106 | 1.94% | 14,906 |
| 2000 | 794,083 | 1.53% | 11,977 |
| 2001 | 800,808 | 0.85% | 6,725 |
| 2002 | 807,600 | 0.85% | 6,792 |
| 2003 | 814,450 | 0.85% | 6,850 |
| 2004 | 821,367 | 0.85% | 6,917 |
| 2005 | 828,323 | 0.85% | 6,956 |
| 2006 | 835,349 | 0.85% | 7,026 |
| 2007 | 842,433 | 0.85% | 7,084 |
| 2008 | 849,588 | 0.85% | 7,155 |
| 2009 | 856,784 | 0.85% | 7,196 |
| 2010 | 864,345 | 0.88% | 7,561 |
| 2011 | 875,178 | 1.25% | 10,833 |
| 2012 | 886,162 | 1.26% | 10,984 |
| 2013 | 897,252 | 1.25% | 11,090 |
| 2014 | 908,498 | 1.25% | 11,246 |
| 2015 | 919,884 | 1.25% | 11,386 |
| 2016 | 931,429 | 1.26% | 11,545 |
| 2017 | 943,086 | 1.25% | 11,657 |
| 2018 | 954,889 | 1.25% | 11,803 |
| 2019 | 966,958 | 1.26% | 12,069 |
| 2020 | 979,381 | 1.28% | 12,423 |
| 2021 | 992,205 | 1.31% | 12,824 |
| 2022 | 1,005,420 | 1.33% | 13,215 |
| 2023 | 1,018,980 | 1.35% | 13,560 |
| 2024 | 1,032,770 | 1.35% | 13,790 |
| 2025 | 1,046,710 | 1.35% | 13,940 |
| 2026 | 1,060,660 | 1.33% | 13,950 |
| 2027 | 1,074,480 | 1.3% | 13,820 |
| 2028 | 1,087,710 | 1.23% | 13,230 |
| 2029 | 1,100,770 | 1.2% | 13,060 |
| 2030 | 1,113,610 | 1.17% | 12,840 |
| 2031 | 1,126,220 | 1.13% | 12,610 |
| 2032 | 1,138,570 | 1.1% | 12,350 |
| 2033 | 1,150,660 | 1.06% | 12,090 |
| 2034 | 1,162,480 | 1.03% | 11,820 |
| 2035 | 1,174,020 | 0.99% | 11,540 |
Name | 2024 Pop. | 2024 Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City | 22,505,300 | 1% |
| Guadalajara | 5,499,680 | 1.47% |
| Monterrey | 5,195,360 | 1.54% |
| Puebla | 3,394,340 | 1.48% |
| Toluca De Lerdo | 2,674,340 | 1.83% |
| Tijuana | 2,297,220 | 1.66% |
| Leon De Los Aldamas | 1,924,440 | 1.35% |
| La Laguna | 1,826,140 | 2.56% |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1,604,080 | 1.38% |
| Queretaro | 1,436,820 | 1.65% |
| San Luis Potosi | 1,292,130 | 1.48% |
| Merida | 1,239,650 | 1.56% |
| Mexicali | 1,196,980 | 1.57% |
| Aguascalientes | 1,179,300 | 1.54% |
| Cuernavaca | 1,140,170 | 1.45% |
| Chihuahua | 1,135,340 | 1.71% |
| Tampico | 1,062,570 | 1.46% |
| Saltillo | 1,050,320 | 1.57% |
| Cancun | 1,045,000 | 2.19% |
| Acapulco De Juarez | 1,032,770 | 1.35% |