
Authoritarian
Flawed Democracy
Full Democracy
Hybrid Regime
Country | Type of Government↑ | EIU Democracy Index Overall Score 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | Authoritarian | 2.11 | |
| Pakistan | Authoritarian | 2.84 | |
| Russia | Authoritarian | 2.03 | |
| Ethiopia | Authoritarian | 3.24 | |
| Egypt | Authoritarian | 2.79 | |
| DR Congo | Authoritarian | 1.92 | |
| Vietnam | Authoritarian | 2.62 | |
| Iran | Authoritarian | 1.96 | |
| Myanmar | Authoritarian | 0.96 | |
| Sudan | Authoritarian | 1.46 | |
| Algeria | Authoritarian | 3.55 | |
| Iraq | Authoritarian | 2.8 | |
| Afghanistan | Authoritarian | 0.25 | |
| Yemen | Authoritarian | 1.95 | |
| Uzbekistan | Authoritarian | 2.1 | |
| Mozambique | Authoritarian | 3.38 | |
| Saudi Arabia | Authoritarian | 2.08 | |
| Cameroon | Authoritarian | 2.56 | |
| Venezuela | Authoritarian | 2.25 | |
| Niger | Authoritarian | 2.26 | |
| North Korea | Authoritarian | 1.08 | |
| Syria | Authoritarian | 1.32 | |
| Mali | Authoritarian | 2.4 | |
| Burkina Faso | Authoritarian | 2.55 | |
| Chad | Authoritarian | 1.89 | |
| Kazakhstan | Authoritarian | 3.08 | |
| Cambodia | Authoritarian | 2.94 | |
| Zimbabwe | Authoritarian | 2.98 | |
| Guinea | Authoritarian | 2.04 | |
| Rwanda | Authoritarian | 3.34 | |
| Burundi | Authoritarian | 2.13 | |
| Haiti | Authoritarian | 2.74 | |
| Jordan | Authoritarian | 3.28 | |
| United Arab Emirates | Authoritarian | 3.07 | |
| Cuba | Authoritarian | 2.58 | |
| Tajikistan | Authoritarian | 1.83 | |
| Azerbaijan | Authoritarian | 2.8 | |
| Togo | Authoritarian | 2.99 | |
| Belarus | Authoritarian | 1.99 | |
| Laos | Authoritarian | 1.71 | |
| Turkmenistan | Authoritarian | 1.66 | |
| Libya | Authoritarian | 2.31 | |
| Kyrgyzstan | Authoritarian | 3.52 | |
| Nicaragua | Authoritarian | 2.09 | |
| Republic of the Congo | Authoritarian | 2.79 | |
| Lebanon | Authoritarian | 3.56 | |
| Palestine | Authoritarian | 3.44 | |
| Central African Republic | Authoritarian | 1.18 | |
| Oman | Authoritarian | 3.05 | |
| Mauritania | Authoritarian | 3.96 | |
| Kuwait | Authoritarian | 2.78 | |
| Eritrea | Authoritarian | 1.97 | |
| Qatar | Authoritarian | 3.17 | |
| Gabon | Authoritarian | 2.18 | |
| Guinea-Bissau | Authoritarian | 2.03 | |
| Equatorial Guinea | Authoritarian | 1.92 | |
| Bahrain | Authoritarian | 2.45 | |
| Eswatini | Authoritarian | 2.6 | |
| Djibouti | Authoritarian | 2.7 | |
| Comoros | Authoritarian | 2.84 | |
| India | Flawed Democracy | 7.29 | |
| United States | Flawed Democracy | 7.85 | |
| Indonesia | Flawed Democracy | 6.44 | |
| Brazil | Flawed Democracy | 6.49 | |
| Philippines | Flawed Democracy | 6.63 | |
| Thailand | Flawed Democracy | 6.27 | |
| France | Flawed Democracy | 7.99 | |
| South Africa | Flawed Democracy | 7.16 | |
| Italy | Flawed Democracy | 7.58 | |
| Colombia | Flawed Democracy | 6.35 | |
| South Korea | Flawed Democracy | 7.75 | |
| Argentina | Flawed Democracy | 6.51 | |
| Poland | Flawed Democracy | 7.4 | |
| Malaysia | Flawed Democracy | 7.11 | |
| Ghana | Flawed Democracy | 6.24 | |
| Sri Lanka | Flawed Democracy | 6.19 | |
| Chile | Flawed Democracy | 7.83 | |
| Belgium | Flawed Democracy | 7.64 | |
| Dominican Republic | Flawed Democracy | 6.62 | |
| Hungary | Flawed Democracy | 6.51 | |
| Israel | Flawed Democracy | 7.8 | |
| Bulgaria | Flawed Democracy | 6.34 | |
| Serbia | Flawed Democracy | 6.26 | |
| Singapore | Flawed Democracy | 6.18 | |
| Slovakia | Flawed Democracy | 7.21 | |
| Panama | Flawed Democracy | 6.84 | |
| Croatia | Flawed Democracy | 6.5 | |
| Mongolia | Flawed Democracy | 6.53 | |
| Namibia | Flawed Democracy | 6.48 | |
| Moldova | Flawed Democracy | 6.04 | |
| Jamaica | Flawed Democracy | 6.74 | |
| Lithuania | Flawed Democracy | 7.59 | |
| Albania | Flawed Democracy | 6.2 | |
| Botswana | Flawed Democracy | 7.63 | |
| Lesotho | Flawed Democracy | 6.06 | |
| Slovenia | Flawed Democracy | 7.82 | |
| Latvia | Flawed Democracy | 7.66 | |
| North Macedonia | Flawed Democracy | 6.28 | |
| Trinidad and Tobago | Flawed Democracy | 7.09 | |
| Timor-Leste | Flawed Democracy | 7.03 | |
| Cyprus | Flawed Democracy | 7.38 | |
| Guyana | Flawed Democracy | 6.11 | |
| Suriname | Flawed Democracy | 6.79 | |
| Montenegro | Flawed Democracy | 6.73 | |
| Malta | Flawed Democracy | 7.93 | |
| Cape Verde | Flawed Democracy | 7.58 | |
| Japan | Full Democracy | 8.48 | |
| Germany | Full Democracy | 8.73 | |
| United Kingdom | Full Democracy | 8.34 | |
| Spain | Full Democracy | 8.13 | |
| Canada | Full Democracy | 8.69 | |
| Australia | Full Democracy | 8.85 | |
| Taiwan | Full Democracy | 8.78 | |
| Netherlands | Full Democracy | 9 | |
| Sweden | Full Democracy | 9.39 | |
| Czechia | Full Democracy | 8.08 | |
| Portugal | Full Democracy | 8.08 | |
| Greece | Full Democracy | 8.07 | |
| Austria | Full Democracy | 8.28 | |
| Switzerland | Full Democracy | 9.32 | |
| Denmark | Full Democracy | 9.28 | |
| Finland | Full Democracy | 9.3 | |
| Norway | Full Democracy | 9.81 | |
| Ireland | Full Democracy | 9.19 | |
| New Zealand | Full Democracy | 9.61 | |
| Costa Rica | Full Democracy | 8.29 | |
| Uruguay | Full Democracy | 8.67 | |
| Estonia | Full Democracy | 8.13 | |
| Mauritius | Full Democracy | 8.23 | |
| Luxembourg | Full Democracy | 8.88 | |
| Iceland | Full Democracy | 9.38 | |
| Nigeria | Hybrid Regime | 4.16 | |
| Bangladesh | Hybrid Regime | 4.44 | |
| Mexico | Hybrid Regime | 5.32 | |
| Turkey | Hybrid Regime | 4.26 | |
| Tanzania | Hybrid Regime | 5.2 | |
| Kenya | Hybrid Regime | 5.05 | |
| Uganda | Hybrid Regime | 4.49 | |
| Angola | Hybrid Regime | 4.05 | |
| Ukraine | Hybrid Regime | 4.9 | |
| Morocco | Hybrid Regime | 4.97 | |
| Peru | Hybrid Regime | 5.69 | |
| Madagascar | Hybrid Regime | 5.33 | |
| Ivory Coast | Hybrid Regime | 4.22 | |
| Nepal | Hybrid Regime | 4.6 | |
| Malawi | Hybrid Regime | 5.85 | |
| Zambia | Hybrid Regime | 5.73 | |
| Senegal | Hybrid Regime | 5.93 | |
| Romania | Hybrid Regime | 5.99 | |
| Guatemala | Hybrid Regime | 4.55 | |
| Ecuador | Hybrid Regime | 5.24 | |
| Benin | Hybrid Regime | 4.44 | |
| Bolivia | Hybrid Regime | 4.26 | |
| Tunisia | Hybrid Regime | 4.71 | |
| Honduras | Hybrid Regime | 4.98 | |
| Papua New Guinea | Hybrid Regime | 5.97 | |
| Sierra Leone | Hybrid Regime | 4.32 | |
| Hong Kong | Hybrid Regime | 5.09 | |
| Paraguay | Hybrid Regime | 5.92 | |
| El Salvador | Hybrid Regime | 4.61 | |
| Liberia | Hybrid Regime | 5.57 | |
| Georgia | Hybrid Regime | 4.7 | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | Hybrid Regime | 5.06 | |
| Armenia | Hybrid Regime | 5.35 | |
| Gambia | Hybrid Regime | 4.47 | |
| Fiji | Hybrid Regime | 5.39 | |
| Bhutan | Hybrid Regime | 5.65 |
What is an authoritarian government? An authoritarian government is one that imposes strict rules that limit the person freedoms of its people. Citizens of countries that have an authoritarian government have diminished rights and priviledges, and are typically unable to freely worship, fully express themselves, or choose their leaders through free and fair elections.
Authoritarian governments can come in many forms, including hereditary dictatorships; military juntas; religious theocracies; and communist, socialist, or fascist regimes. Many authoritarian governments also rank among the most corrupt governments in the world.
The line determining where democracy ends and where authoritarianism begins can be blurry. To clear the air, here are five vital tell-tale signs that point to a government being more authoritarian.
There are many types of authoritarian governments. These include military regimes, oligarchic, indirect military regimes, dominant party regimes, monarchies, and personalist regimes.
The three main types of authoritarian governments include:
In countries like Saudi Arabia, hereditary rulers lead the country and have done so for years. This ruler has absolute power and can maintain or create new rules without consulting anyone.
In countries like Burma, the military controls the government. The armed forces are actively involved in the decision-making, law-making, and day-to-day running of the country.
Authoritarian governments in this category use the media and other means to promote specific ideas. Countries like the People’s Republic of China and the Islamic Republic of Iran are ideological-based.
Authoritarian governments clinch power through a military coup, a popular uprising, or by the peaceful transfer of power from a non-authoritarian ruler to an authoritarian successor.
The military moves to overthrow the government in power and successfully install their preferred leader.
Large masses of civilians can come together to demonstrate against the sitting leader. They either create chaos or peacefully protest to trigger change. Succession
In several authoritarian countries, the outgoing ruler gets to choose their successor. The exchange of power often takes place peacefully. In an absolute monarch type of government, the succession of power happens when the current ruler dies.
The transfer of power in this category may also occur if the current ruler is sick or too old to rule effectively. Therefore, they choose their offspring or a family member to succeed them.