Critical Race Theory Status
State | Critical Race Theory Status↓ | |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Arkansas | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Florida | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Georgia | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Idaho | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Indiana | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Iowa | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Kentucky | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Louisiana | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Mississippi | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Montana | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| North Dakota | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Oklahoma | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| South Carolina | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| South Dakota | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Tennessee | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Texas | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Utah | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Virginia | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Wyoming | Signed into Law or Similarly Approved | |
| Connecticut | Proposed or In-Process | |
| Missouri | Proposed or In-Process | |
| New Jersey | Proposed or In-Process | |
| North Carolina | Proposed or In-Process | |
| Alaska | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Arizona | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Colorado | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Illinois | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Kansas | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Maine | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Maryland | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Michigan | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Minnesota | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Nebraska | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| New Hampshire | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| New Mexico | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| New York | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Ohio | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Oregon | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Pennsylvania | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Rhode Island | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Washington | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| West Virginia | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| Wisconsin | Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled | |
| California | No Ban Attempt | |
| Delaware | No Ban Attempt | |
| District of Columbia | No Ban Attempt | |
| Hawaii | No Ban Attempt | |
| Massachusetts | No Ban Attempt | |
| Nevada | No Ban Attempt | |
| Vermont | No Ban Attempt |
In some states, laws or official policies have been adopted that restrict how certain concepts related to race and identity can be taught in public schools. These measures typically limit classroom instruction that presents ideas such as inherent racial superiority, collective responsibility for historical actions, or similar concepts tied to race or sex.
When a state is marked as “Signed into Law or Similarly Approved,” it means a restriction has been formally adopted through legislation, an executive order, a state board action, or another legally binding policy. The table shows which states currently fall into this category under their existing education laws.
In several states, legislation has been introduced that would restrict how certain concepts related to race, identity, or historical responsibility are discussed in public school classrooms. These proposals often focus on limiting instruction involving what lawmakers describe as “divisive concepts,” though the specific language and scope of the bills can vary widely from state to state.
States labeled “Proposed or In-Process” have seen bills introduced or policy proposals considered by lawmakers or education authorities. These measures have not yet become law but remain part of ongoing legislative or policy discussions about how race-related topics are addressed in school curricula.
In some states, lawmakers have proposed restrictions on critical race theory or related classroom instruction, but those efforts did not ultimately take effect. Proposed legislation may be vetoed by a governor, ruled unconstitutional by a court, or fail to advance through the legislative process.
States listed as “Vetoed, Overturned, or Stalled” have seen attempts to enact CRT-related restrictions that were introduced but did not become enforceable policy. These outcomes reflect the varied legislative and political responses across the country to proposals addressing how race-related concepts may be taught in public schools.
A small number of states and jurisdictions have not introduced legislation or formal policies aimed at restricting the teaching of critical race theory or related concepts in public schools. In these places, lawmakers and education authorities have not pursued measures similar to those proposed or adopted elsewhere.
States labeled “No Ban Attempt” in the table indicate that no significant legislative or policy effort to restrict CRT-related instruction has been introduced based on the available data. This does not necessarily mean debates about curriculum have not occurred, only that no formal ban proposal has been recorded.