Most Racist States 2025

District of Columbia
2.62
New Jersey
1.48
Massachusetts
0.874
Vermont
0.802
Washington
0.773
Oregon
0.734
Utah
0.542
California
0.533
New York
0.524
Colorado
0.477
Kansas
0.442
Maryland
0.42
Ohio
0.384
Maine
0.383
West Virginia
0.379
Michigan
0.376
Kentucky
0.361
Alabama
0.36
Minnesota
0.358
Wyoming
0.356
Nevada
0.349
Arizona
0.332
Missouri
0.326
Nebraska
0.311
Virginia
0.309
Connecticut
0.294
Alaska
0.282
North Dakota
0.274
Illinois
0.272
New Hampshire
0.268
Indiana
0.264
North Carolina
0.262
Idaho
0.256
Rhode Island
0.25
Wisconsin
0.247
Pennsylvania
0.227
Iowa
0.211
South Carolina
0.206
New Mexico
0.206
Delaware
0.187
Hawaii
0.172
Texas
0.164
Oklahoma
0.153
Tennessee
0.145
Louisiana
0.128
Georgia
0.126
South Dakota
0.118
Florida
0.104
Arkansas
0.0998
Montana
0.0962
Mississippi
0.0578
State
# of Hate Crimes per 10k Pop
# of Hate Crimes 2023
% of Hate Crimes with Racial/Ethnic/Ancestry Bias 2023
# of Hate Groups 2023
SDG Score 2021
Location Quotient of Racist Post-Election Tweets 2012
Alabama Flag
Alabama0.3618758.3%2027.88.1
Alaska Flag
Alaska0.2822147.6%533.3
Arizona Flag
Arizona0.33225552.9%3933.10.2
Arkansas Flag
Arkansas0.09983158.1%1528.31.9
California Flag
California0.5332,11452.4%117350.5
Colorado Flag
Colorado0.47728751.2%30371.9
Connecticut Flag
Connecticut0.29410944%1433.30.5
Delaware Flag
Delaware0.1872050%331.31.3
District of Columbia Flag
District of Columbia2.6218855.3%131.5
Florida Flag
Florida0.10424948.6%114321.3
Georgia Flag
Georgia0.12614257%49323.6
Hawaii Flag
Hawaii0.1722568%945.6
Idaho Flag
Idaho0.2565263.5%2542.2
Illinois Flag
Illinois0.27234754.5%3926.31.5
Indiana Flag
Indiana0.26418458.7%3120.80.3
Iowa Flag
Iowa0.2116956.5%1032.70.4
Kansas Flag
Kansas0.44213253.8%1032.22.4
Kentucky Flag
Kentucky0.36116754.5%1829.51.9
Louisiana Flag
Louisiana0.1285956.3%825.63.3
Maine Flag
Maine0.3835448.3%1240.40.9
Maryland Flag
Maryland0.4226555.8%25351.6
Massachusetts Flag
Massachusetts0.87463045.2%1336.50.5
Michigan Flag
Michigan0.37638360.8%3631.40.6
Minnesota Flag
Minnesota0.35820949.8%2234.32.7
Mississippi Flag
Mississippi0.05781764.7%430.97.4
Missouri Flag
Missouri0.32620555.1%2727.83.0
Montana Flag
Montana0.09621145.4%1736.6
Nebraska Flag
Nebraska0.3116338%1333.71.1
Nevada Flag
Nevada0.34911667.4%1532.70.5
New Hampshire Flag
New Hampshire0.2683842.1%1639.90.8
New Jersey Flag
New Jersey1.481,42251.3%2131.20.5
New Mexico Flag
New Mexico0.2064450%532.91.6
New York Flag
New York0.5241,04831.9%6332.90.3
North Carolina Flag
North Carolina0.26229458.5%5032.81.5
North Dakota Flag
North Dakota0.2742254.4%730.93.5
Ohio Flag
Ohio0.38445948.1%5026.61.4
Oklahoma Flag
Oklahoma0.1536379%1731.90.5
Oregon Flag
Oregon0.73431560.3%2343.11.5
Pennsylvania Flag
Pennsylvania0.22729853%7824.10.7
Rhode Island Flag
Rhode Island0.252850%1032.6
South Carolina Flag
South Carolina0.20611560.9%3335.31.4
South Dakota Flag
South Dakota0.1181154.5%1235.6
Tennessee Flag
Tennessee0.14510654.7%3732.13.1
Texas Flag
Texas0.16452155.1%9729.81.3
Utah Flag
Utah0.54219336.3%2032.53.5
Vermont Flag
Vermont0.8025258.1%341.5
Virginia Flag
Virginia0.30927563.2%45321.5
Washington Flag
Washington0.77362348.6%4137.61.0
West Virginia Flag
West Virginia0.3796743.3%1227.62.8
Wisconsin Flag
Wisconsin0.24714849.3%2828.21.9
Wyoming Flag
Wyoming0.3562147.6%934.1
United States Flag
United States0.37112,7541,430
  • Hate crimes in this data include offenses motivated by bias against race/ethnicity/ancestry, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender, and gender identity.
  • The number of hate groups includes both local and national organizations operating within the state.
  • SDG Ranking measures each state’s progress toward achieving all 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a focus on racial equity. It reflects the progress of the most disadvantaged racial group in areas like education, healthcare, income, and justice. A higher score means smaller racial disparities, while a lower score suggests larger gaps. Since it highlights racial inequalities, a low SDG score may indicate systemic racism in policies and societal structures.
  • Location Quotient indicates the prevalence of racist tweets following the 2012 election compared to the number of non-racist tweets (1.0) in a given state. For example, a location quotient of 1.0 would indicate that racist and non-racist tweets occurred with roughly equal frequency. An LQ of 2.5 would indicate that racist tweets were 2.5 times more frequent than non-racist tweets, and an LQ of 0.5 would indicate that racist tweets were half as common as non-racist tweets.