Map Options
State laws regarding video surveillance have to be consistent with the Constitution's Fourth Amendment. Under the amendment, people cannot be surveilled without their consent in places where they have a “reasonable expectation of privacy,” such as within their homes or hotel rooms, in bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, in doctor’s or lawyer’s offices, or when speaking with a therapist or minister. However, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when a person is on public roadways or in areas where the public is generally present, such as malls, stores, offices, or on public transit. People can be surveilled in these places without their knowledge or consent.
Most states permit video surveillance in private places if the person being filmed consents to the surveillance. Generally, all that is required to give consent is to willingly enter a place where signs are posted stating that surveillance is taking place.
In all 50 states, unauthorized video surveillance for “malicious” or “unlawful” purposes is prohibited and in most states is a felony if it is done for purposes of sexual gratification—so-called “peeping tom” laws.
There is no prohibition on employers using cameras to surveil their employees—the exception being that they can’t video or record employees engaged in union organizing activities, since that is a violation of federal labor laws.
There are 15 states that have laws specific to video surveillance. For example, California law makes it illegal for anyone to record videos of communications that are confidential.
A small group of states, Tennessee, Utah, New Hampshire, Maine, Kansas, South Dakota, Delaware, Arkansas, and Michigan, prohibit video surveillance or the use of hidden cameras in all places where someone has a reasonable expectation of privacy unless you have obtained consent from people being filmed. Hawaii also requires consent when installing security cameras. On the other hand, Florida, Alabama, and Minnesota allow hidden video surveillance in non-private settings.
Laws regulating surveillance and recording typically require one of two forms of consent: one-party consent or all-party consent. In states with one-party consent, a conversation may be recorded so long as at least one of the parties participating in the conversation consents to it. By comparison, in states with all-party consent, every person participating in the conversation must give their consent in order for the conversation to be legally recorded.
Consent requirements and guidelines are often variable. Many states apply consent requirements in private places, where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, but remove those requirements in public places where privacy has been voluntarily forfeited. Also, the definition of consent can vary significantly from one state to another.
State | Video Surveillance Laws | Additional Details |
---|---|---|
Alabama | One-Party Consent | According to Ala. Code § 13A-11-30 you are not allowed to video record people in “A place where one ... |
Alaska | One-Party Consent | Alaska's highest court has specifically held that the eavesdropping statute is only in place to addr... |
Arizona | One-Party Consent | Consent is required to record conversations in which there is a legal expectation of privacy, though... |
Arkansas | One-Party Consent | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-60-120 Consent is required to record conversations in which there is a legal expe... |
Colorado | One-Party Consent | In Colorado it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications whether it’s wire, o... |
District of Columbia | One-Party Consent | In D.C. it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications whether it’s wire, oral ... |
Georgia | One-Party Consent | In Georgia it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or disclose communications, whether ... |
Hawaii | One-Party Consent | Hawaii recording law stipulates that it is a one-party consent state. In Hawaii, it is a criminal of... |
Idaho | One-Party Consent | Idaho recording law stipulates that it is a one-party consent state. In Idaho, it is a criminal offe... |
Indiana | One-Party Consent | In Indiana, it is a criminal offense to use any device to intercept communications, whether wire or ... |
Iowa | One-Party Consent | In Iowa, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they are wire,... |
Kansas | One-Party Consent | In Kansas, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record, listen to or amplify communications... |
Kentucky | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use communications, whether t... |
Louisiana | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, use or share communications, whether t... |
Maine | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, use or share communications, whether t... |
Minnesota | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use communications, whether t... |
Mississippi | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use communications, whether t... |
Missouri | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they’re wire o... |
Nebraska | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they are wire,... |
Nevada | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use oral conversations withou... |
New Jersey | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they are oral ... |
New Mexico | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use wire communications witho... |
New York | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use communications, whether t... |
North Carolina | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they are wire,... |
North Dakota | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they are wire,... |
Ohio | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they are wire,... |
Oklahoma | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Rhode Island | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
South Carolina | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
South Dakota | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Tennessee | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Texas | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Utah | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Vermont | One-Party Consent | Vermont does not have an official law related to call recording, so Federal Law applies. This makes ... |
Virginia | One-Party Consent | In Virginia, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, wheth... |
West Virginia | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Wisconsin | One-Party Consent | In Wisconsin, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whet... |
Wyoming | One-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are w... |
Oregon | Mixed Consent | Oregon Law is mixed. For in person oral recordings it is required to have consent from all parties, ... |
California | All-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they’re wire, oral or e... |
Connecticut | All-Party Consent | Connecticut can be considered as both a one party state and two party state. This is because there a... |
Delaware | All-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they are wire, oral or ... |
Florida | All-Party Consent | In D.C. it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications whether it’s wire, oral ... |
Illinois | All-Party Consent | In Illinois, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they’re wi... |
Maryland | All-Party Consent | Maryland’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act stipulates that it is a two-party consent sta... |
Massachusetts | All-Party Consent | Massachusetts recording law stipulates that it is a two-party consent state. In Massachusetts, it is... |
Michigan | All-Party Consent | On the surface it appears that Michigan is an all party consent state, but previously a Michigan cou... |
Montana | All-Party Consent | Montana recording law stipulates that it is a two-party consent state, excluding some specific situa... |
New Hampshire | All-Party Consent | New Hampshire recording law stipulates that it is a two-party consent state. In New Hampshire, it is... |
Pennsylvania | All-Party Consent | Pennsylvania recording law stipulates that it is a two-party consent state. In Pennsylvania, it is a... |
Washington | All-Party Consent | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they are wire, oral or ... |