
Lower
Maintain
No policy
Raise (Pronatalist)
Country | Population Policy/Goal 2015-2019↓ | Total Fertility Rate (Avg. Births Per Woman) 2015-2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.7 | |
| Russia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.8 | |
| Japan | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.4 | |
| Iran | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.2 | |
| Turkey | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.1 | |
| Thailand | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| France | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.9 | |
| Italy | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.3 | |
| South Korea | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.1 | |
| Spain | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.3 | |
| Ukraine | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.4 | |
| Poland | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.4 | |
| Saudi Arabia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.3 | |
| North Korea | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.9 | |
| Kazakhstan | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.8 | |
| Chile | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.7 | |
| Romania | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.6 | |
| South Sudan | Raise (Pronatalist) | 4.7 | |
| United Arab Emirates | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.4 | |
| Cuba | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.6 | |
| Portugal | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.3 | |
| Greece | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.3 | |
| Hungary | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Israel | Raise (Pronatalist) | 3.0 | |
| Austria | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Belarus | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.7 | |
| Turkmenistan | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.8 | |
| Kyrgyzstan | Raise (Pronatalist) | 3.0 | |
| Bulgaria | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.6 | |
| Serbia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Singapore | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.2 | |
| Finland | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Slovakia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Kuwait | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.1 | |
| Croatia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.4 | |
| Georgia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.1 | |
| Mongolia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.9 | |
| Qatar | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.9 | |
| Moldova | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.3 | |
| Armenia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.8 | |
| Lithuania | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.7 | |
| Albania | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.6 | |
| Gabon | Raise (Pronatalist) | 4.0 | |
| Latvia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.7 | |
| North Macedonia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Cyprus | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.3 | |
| Estonia | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.6 | |
| Mauritius | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.4 | |
| Guyana | Raise (Pronatalist) | 2.5 | |
| Luxembourg | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Malta | Raise (Pronatalist) | 1.5 | |
| Liechtenstein | Raise (Pronatalist) | ||
| Cook Islands | Raise (Pronatalist) | ||
| Niue | Raise (Pronatalist) | ||
| Vatican City | Raise (Pronatalist) | ||
| United States | No policy | 1.8 | |
| Brazil | No policy | 1.7 | |
| Germany | No policy | 1.6 | |
| United Kingdom | No policy | 1.8 | |
| South Africa | No policy | 2.4 | |
| Myanmar | No policy | 2.2 | |
| Sudan | No policy | 4.4 | |
| Iraq | No policy | 3.7 | |
| Canada | No policy | 1.5 | |
| Uzbekistan | No policy | 2.4 | |
| Malaysia | No policy | 2.0 | |
| Venezuela | No policy | 2.3 | |
| Australia | No policy | 1.8 | |
| Sri Lanka | No policy | 2.2 | |
| Somalia | No policy | 6.1 | |
| Guatemala | No policy | 2.9 | |
| Netherlands | No policy | 1.7 | |
| Cambodia | No policy | 2.5 | |
| Honduras | No policy | 2.5 | |
| Sweden | No policy | 1.9 | |
| Czechia | No policy | 1.6 | |
| Switzerland | No policy | 1.5 | |
| Laos | No policy | 2.7 | |
| Libya | No policy | 2.3 | |
| Republic of the Congo | No policy | 4.5 | |
| Denmark | No policy | 1.8 | |
| Lebanon | No policy | 2.1 | |
| Liberia | No policy | 4.4 | |
| Norway | No policy | 1.7 | |
| Palestine | No policy | 3.7 | |
| Central African Republic | No policy | 4.8 | |
| Ireland | No policy | 1.8 | |
| New Zealand | No policy | 1.9 | |
| Costa Rica | No policy | 1.8 | |
| Panama | No policy | 2.5 | |
| Uruguay | No policy | 2.0 | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | No policy | 1.3 | |
| Namibia | No policy | 3.4 | |
| Slovenia | No policy | 1.6 | |
| Suriname | No policy | 2.4 | |
| Maldives | No policy | 1.9 | |
| Brunei | No policy | 1.8 | |
| Belize | No policy | 2.3 | |
| Bahamas | No policy | 1.8 | |
| Barbados | No policy | 1.6 | |
| Sao Tome and Principe | No policy | 4.4 | |
| Saint Lucia | No policy | 1.4 | |
| Seychelles | No policy | 2.5 | |
| Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | No policy | 1.9 | |
| Antigua and Barbuda | No policy | 2.0 | |
| Dominica | No policy | ||
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | No policy | ||
| San Marino | No policy | ||
| Palau | No policy | ||
| Vietnam | Maintain | 2.1 | |
| Tanzania | Maintain | 4.9 | |
| Colombia | Maintain | 1.8 | |
| Argentina | Maintain | 2.3 | |
| Morocco | Maintain | 2.4 | |
| Bolivia | Maintain | 2.8 | |
| Tunisia | Maintain | 2.2 | |
| Belgium | Maintain | 1.7 | |
| Azerbaijan | Maintain | 2.1 | |
| Paraguay | Maintain | 2.4 | |
| Oman | Maintain | 2.9 | |
| Botswana | Maintain | 2.9 | |
| Trinidad and Tobago | Maintain | 1.7 | |
| Iceland | Maintain | 1.8 | |
| Grenada | Maintain | 2.1 | |
| Tonga | Maintain | 3.6 | |
| Andorra | Maintain | ||
| Monaco | Maintain | ||
| Nauru | Maintain | ||
| India | Lower | 2.2 | |
| Indonesia | Lower | 2.3 | |
| Pakistan | Lower | 3.6 | |
| Nigeria | Lower | 5.4 | |
| Bangladesh | Lower | 2.1 | |
| Ethiopia | Lower | 4.3 | |
| Mexico | Lower | 2.1 | |
| Egypt | Lower | 3.3 | |
| Philippines | Lower | 2.6 | |
| DR Congo | Lower | 6.0 | |
| Kenya | Lower | 3.5 | |
| Uganda | Lower | 5.0 | |
| Algeria | Lower | 3.1 | |
| Afghanistan | Lower | 4.6 | |
| Yemen | Lower | 3.8 | |
| Angola | Lower | 5.6 | |
| Mozambique | Lower | 4.9 | |
| Ghana | Lower | 3.9 | |
| Peru | Lower | 2.3 | |
| Madagascar | Lower | 4.1 | |
| Ivory Coast | Lower | 4.7 | |
| Cameroon | Lower | 4.6 | |
| Nepal | Lower | 1.9 | |
| Niger | Lower | 7.0 | |
| Syria | Lower | 2.8 | |
| Mali | Lower | 5.9 | |
| Burkina Faso | Lower | 5.2 | |
| Malawi | Lower | 4.3 | |
| Zambia | Lower | 4.7 | |
| Chad | Lower | 5.8 | |
| Senegal | Lower | 4.7 | |
| Ecuador | Lower | 2.4 | |
| Zimbabwe | Lower | 3.6 | |
| Guinea | Lower | 4.7 | |
| Benin | Lower | 4.9 | |
| Rwanda | Lower | 4.1 | |
| Burundi | Lower | 5.5 | |
| Haiti | Lower | 3.0 | |
| Jordan | Lower | 2.8 | |
| Dominican Republic | Lower | 2.4 | |
| Tajikistan | Lower | 3.6 | |
| Papua New Guinea | Lower | 3.6 | |
| Togo | Lower | 4.4 | |
| Sierra Leone | Lower | 4.3 | |
| Nicaragua | Lower | 2.4 | |
| El Salvador | Lower | 2.1 | |
| Mauritania | Lower | 4.6 | |
| Eritrea | Lower | 4.1 | |
| Jamaica | Lower | 2.0 | |
| Gambia | Lower | 5.3 | |
| Lesotho | Lower | 3.2 | |
| Guinea-Bissau | Lower | 4.5 | |
| Equatorial Guinea | Lower | 4.6 | |
| Bahrain | Lower | 2.0 | |
| Timor-Leste | Lower | 4.1 | |
| Eswatini | Lower | 3.0 | |
| Djibouti | Lower | 2.8 | |
| Fiji | Lower | 2.8 | |
| Comoros | Lower | 4.2 | |
| Solomon Islands | Lower | 3.6 | |
| Bhutan | Lower | 2.0 | |
| Montenegro | Lower | 1.8 | |
| Cape Verde | Lower | 2.3 | |
| Vanuatu | Lower | 3.8 | |
| Samoa | Lower | 3.9 | |
| Kiribati | Lower | 3.6 | |
| Micronesia | Lower | 3.1 | |
| Marshall Islands | Lower | ||
| Tuvalu | Lower |
Pronatalist countries are countries with low birth rates and policies that they implement as a means of increasing the birth rates. When a country has a very slow rate of births and a fast rate of aging, it may become a pronatalist country in order to keep the population growth steady. This is for a variety of reasons; to increase tax revenue, improve the economy, and to keep families stable overall.
The United Nations indicates that many countries are in this position right now, and the number of pronatalist countries in the world is increasing annually. It is estimated that the number of countries that have adopted pronatalist policies has risen from 10 to 15 percent between 2001 and 2015. Some countries that have these policies will provide extra income to families as support to larger families, and as an incentive to have more children.
There is a long list of countries with low birth rates, and a long list of pronatalist countries. The list of countries with pronatalist policies is always changing, and some governments adopt moderate pronatalist policies to meet the best of both worlds. Many governments have party factions that do not want to give money to people with more children, and moderate pronatalist policy is typically the answer.
The most well-known pronatalist countries include Canada, many countries in Europe, as well as many in Asia, such as Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and Singapore. France is a country with a low birth rate and so is Germany. However, Germany has hesitated to adopt the pronatalist policy. Instead, Germany provides a generous two-parent family leave program when there is a new member of the family.
A pronatalist policy is one that the government enacts in order to aid in the support of families, and also increase the fertility rates of a country. The aim is to ensure economic stability both in the short term and in the long term. The most common form of pronatalist policy comes in the form of a child tax credit benefit, which is typically a payment made to qualifying families with children of eligible age. Other tax credits can be included in the policy of pronatalist countries.
Another goal is to control population size, but also to ensure population growth. Europe is known for its pronatalist policy with France and Sweden assisting families with children. When the country’s population rates are slowing, legislators in pronatalist countries work to implement policy to help the population now and ensure economic growth in the future.